0
fmmobley

My first 2 minute flight

Recommended Posts

Quote

Congratulations!

The sad news is 3 minutes is probably your immediate next goal:P and 4 minutes after that....;)



You depress me:(. I've only just made it to 2:40 from 13k ft.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


With time you will realize it is not about time.



Not quite.
The slower you fall, the less pressure on your arms. Less pressure on your arms, less fatigue. Less fatigue, longer flight. And finally, the longer you fly, the further you fly. And isn't that what wingsuiting is all about?:)
Also, while some would say more speed equals more lift, I would say more speed equals more drag. I don't believe in lift generating vortices, just surface area.:P
Tristan
Will you answer "NO" to my next question?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If a newbie focuses on time they will learn how to stall.

Fly for distance and time comes naturally.

SM1 best glide speed is near stall, this not the case for most other suits on the market.

Quote

I don't believe in lift generating vortices, just surface area.



Attach some wool strands to the back of your suit Tristan and have someone film you.

If you don't believe it, make TristanSuits ;)
BASEstore.it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Attach some wool strands to the back of your suit Tristan and have someone film you.



Those strands will dance around like crazy because there are all kinds of weird vortices in my burble, non that make me fly further I think.

Quote

If you don't believe it, make TristanSuits ;)



I first have to get over my masculinity and male/female stereotypes before I can learn to sew.:P
Tristan
Will you answer "NO" to my next question?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure, in theory you should be able to create a nice wing profile that generates lift and maybe with some suits when flying it right this might happen to some extent.
I just think that for now it's mostly just the wind pressing against the bottom of the wings. In the case of lift generated by the wing profile, this would be neglect able in comparison. Therefore, and you can quote me on this, "bigger is better".;)
In fact, I have not mentioned lift since, assuming the above line of thought to be correct, one might conclude there is no lift generated...

Tristan
Will you answer "NO" to my next question?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



right... glide ratio = lift / drag.... lift is zero... ok.

This is a kind of Zen thing right?



I think its the Newtonian explanation Tristan is talking about

http://www.funpaperairplanes.com/Learn%20About%20Flight.html

If its full on 'lift theory' we're speaking, the single layer suit Tony has wouldnt fly at al? But according to people who have flown (with) it, it flies really well, just a tad heavier on the arms then the suits that have pressurized support in the wing.

I tend to be somewhere in the middle. I do believe lift is part of why we 'fly', but seeing how quick the airflow separates the topsurface of the wing, I think it doesn't attribute to the degree a lot of people are claiming...
JC
FlyLikeBrick
I'm an Athlete?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Keep in mind that a lifting body can achieve lift from all surfaces even without proper wing profiles. A planes fuselage produces minimal amounts of lift while climbing.

You can turn a brick into a lifting body with enough airspeed.
WSI-6 / PFI-55
The Brothers Gray Wingsuit Academy
http://www.myspace.com/cgwingsuitpilot
http://www.myspace.com/thebrothersgray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Keep in mind that a lifting body can achieve lift from all surfaces even without proper wing profiles. A planes fuselage produces minimal amounts of lift while climbing.

You can turn a brick into a lifting body with enough airspeed.



Which is not lift based on the Bernoulli principle, but lift from 'deflection' based on the Newtonian explanation..
JC
FlyLikeBrick
I'm an Athlete?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look up Rogala hang gliders, you don't need a profile to generate lift. The resulting air flow around the object is what creates the "profile".

Wingsuits generate conventional and vortex lift.

According to Tristans theory all we have to do is maximize our surface area presented to the air flow - this would be achieved by going straight down (?) ;)

BASEstore.it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, while some would say more speed equals more lift, I would say more speed equals more drag. I don't believe in lift generating vortices, just surface area.:P



Mikoyan Gurevich didn´t believe in surface area. He thought that speed generates lift I assume...

Check the picture.

http://www.airforce.ru/aircraft/mikoyan/mig-21/mig-21smt/index.htm

(I don´t know how to make this clicky...)
- No mercy in the flock! Straighten your legs!!! -

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Which is not lift based on the Bernoulli principle, but lift from 'deflection' based on the Newtonian explanation..



Neither explanation on its own explains how lift is generated by any wing, in the real world they are very much combined.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0