LetsGoOutside 0 #151 October 28, 2009 I actually apply trig/physics on a day-to-day basis as natural user interface and physical computing developer, so I've had the joy of seeing theory manifested into reality many times over. Unless you're actively working in the field, why crunch the numbers? You've been discounted on here numerous times by those who actually design, cut, sew, and fly. What's theory without experimentation, evidence? Nothing. I really don't see the relevance here. Flying on experience, instincts, and a clear mind is the way to go for both reward and safety, IMO. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pgpilot 0 #152 January 19, 2010 S-Bird for sale! In great condition. Fits someone around 5'9" or so. I have too many wingsuits now... and another one coming. PM me for details. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grayhghost 0 #153 January 19, 2010 QuoteMathYuri, It is obvious to me that the X-Bird flies considerably slower than the V3. From your mathematical perspective, do you think it stalls more easily? Is it flying close to a stall point? thanks! it feels weird replying to myself, but my question got answered through an email The X-Bird will be harder to stall than a V3 because of its lower wingloading, the same way a 260 sqft Blackjack is harder to stall than a Xaos-27 even though the Blackjack flies forward more slowly. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pierre3636 0 #154 January 20, 2010 hiii finally jumped mine on sat ... very fast forward and very slow if wanted. I have the big one ie X-wing and it was very very easy to fly. not tiring at all for me. i like the suit - thumbs up from me. ~ time is ~ time was ~ times past ~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
