kallend 2,027 #26 February 2, 2010 Quote Next week we will start implementing Kallends method into the software, so its quick and easy to play with. And we want to include a few more features, and will than slowly start working towards a first (pubicly available, free) version.. Are you going to allow a uniform stretch or compression?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mccordia 74 #27 February 2, 2010 We'll ask tom to make it a setting we can alter from zero to a hundred, so its fiddle-able for testing and playing.. Once thats in place, we'll start looking at a more wide testgroup, and than hopefully quick there-after a version we can offer to everyone for public testing and playing with mutiple judging and briefing methods...JC FlyLikeBrick I'm an Athlete? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DSE 5 #28 February 3, 2010 Quote If flying a docked formation involves downsizing wings, where does it stop? I have flown in a docked formation of over 200, WITH NO WINGS AT ALL. One can't ignore the validity and cool factor of a docked formation, IMO. However, since formations of planes seem to be one of the cited benchmarks, it's unlikely we'll ever see a formation consisting of 172's, Otters, DC3's, and CRJ700's's, either. I question that they could all fly efficiently together. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
