0
Buried

Defining Parameters

Recommended Posts

Hey All,

I am just trying to get some exposure out there since I and I'm sure others weren't made aware of the status of where the workgroup was with things until recently and wanted to participate. There' also been some through provoking posts made on the IPC forum to maybe spark some ideas.

The url for where you can post was in the locked & stickied thread was incorrect for some time. It has now been updated or can be found at the bottom of this post.

For whomever is interested, the IPC workgroup is now brainstorming and collecting thoughts about how to define and describe no-contact 2d wingsuit formation rules. If you have something to add, be it your own opinion as to what those should or shouldn't be, feel free post on their message board or post here. Please don't regurgitate what others have said.

They will be looking at all things said and will formulate how they would like to proceed in the long term.


If you more comfortable not posting, you can email the group directly, but they'd probably ask to post whatever you sent them -

Jacqui Bruwer, jacqui@projectlink.co.za
Larry Bagley, lbagley@uspa.org
Ronald Overdijk, ronald@knvvl.nl

below is a few things they are currently looking at
Defining the Parameters

Two dimensional
Formation designs will be two-dimensional for this record category. How can/should we limit vertical deviation, and should we require evidence of flatness for judging (i.e. a side camera angle)?

2. Slot Definition
A slot is a target in the air for each flyer in the formation (some examples: a single point on the head, a shape such as a circle, box, or any other shape around the entire body). How should the rules define slot?

3. Margin of Error
Margin of error is a standard for how far a flyer is allowed to deviate from his/her slot (however defined) to still be considered “in” the formation. How should the rules define Margin of Error?

4. Flight Angle
Based on the slot position, Flight Angle is the angle at which the flyer is located relative to the next flyer. To which degree, if at all, will we limit the relative angles at which slots within a formation can be flown?

5. Short Range and Long Range Order
Depending on the method used, flyers can be judged on their relative position on an individual basis (short range order), or the formation can be judged as a whole by its shape and form (long range order), or both. How should the rules address this?

6. Glide Ratio/Flight Performance
Should there be a minimum required glide ratio or overall flight performance of the formation?
How would that be measured?

7. other? - Add your own.


http://www.fai.org/parachuting/node/2181

Where is my fizzy-lifting drink?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0