Spills

Members
  • Content

    86
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by Spills

  1. Yeah, Ill just take the shuttle.
  2. So I'm making my first trip to Eloy on the 19th and trying to figure the best way to get there. By best I mean cheapest. The shuttle is $60 each way and although you can get a rental car for $190 that isn't including the $120 in fees and taxes. Renting a Uhaul is cheaper including the mileage. I read in an earlier post from 2006 I think that there was a super 8 shuttle but not sure if that is still around. Is there anyone else headed out at that time? Im guessing the shuttle is cheaper with more people, if not a limo would probably be. Any other options? I'd like to save my much money for jumping and beer..
  3. Don't need a B license, but you DO need to bring beer now. I knew someone was going to nab me with a case as soon as I submitted the post. So it would be 3 cases..
  4. I was wondering if you needed to have your B license to attend? I might have it by then but I'm not sure. This would also be my first boogie and I'm trying to get a couple of other people from the DC area to come down as well. Thanks
  5. Do you think that a coach simply using a camera on a jump would be useful? I know when I was working on getting my license I kept rotating onto my back/ side when I was pitching and the instructor was having some trouble figuring out why. He said he wished he had it on video to try and figure it out. It might have saved me 2 or 3 student jumps. I guess what I'm trying to ask is videographer trying to get the best shot while the coach is simply documenting the jump. I don't know if there is a differnece or not but I feel with my limited experience that it would have helped my training. And the DZ I was getting my license at did not have a video guy or tandems.
  6. Thanks!! I know I am far off from putting a camera on my head or that huge light. I'm still having problems docking on a 2-way. And one of the main things that I love about the sport is that the sky is a big place and there is a lot of different things you can do and learn. I see how people can do it for 20+ years and not get burned out. I'm planning a winter trip to do some tunnel time and canopy course so hopefully I can start to build the foundation.
  7. With all the new small format -cameras coming to the market I was wondering if this changes the dynamics of the current USPA recommendations of having 200 jumps. I am not implying that anyone with an A license should be able to strap on a camera and start jumping but wondering if a camera rating might be helpful. As a cycling coach I know the importance of short-term goals and think a camera rating might not only improve safety but give new jumpers attainable goals to reach for and keep them jumping. Several factors concerning safety come to mind with the use of cameras. DZs have different policies about the number of jumps you need and I’m not sure if I feel safe in a landing pattern at a DZ that has 50 jump jumpers trying to film videos right before landing. Although I want to use a camera I’m not sure if just having 200 jumps would make me an expert on dealing with camera related malfunctions. I would personally feel more comfortable having 100 to 150 jumps and either attended a class or some type of training. With that said having the rating would show the S&TA or who ever that although I only have 100 jumps I have undergone camera specific training and do not pose a significant risk to myself or others. As a new jumper 50 jumps seems like a lot and it looking at the current progression it seems like after my B 100 is an eternity before my next milestone. Creating another step that seems attainable in the same year would be nice. By creating a rating that either falls between the B license and C license or coach and C might be useful too keep jumpers motivated. Not saying that jumping alone isn’t fun enough and some people might wish to ignore the rating and keep jumping without a camera. Personally I like to keep learning and I think this would help foster the idea that a skydiver is never done learning. Also from what I can tell camera flying is its own unique discipline that some might wish to lean towards. I know I could work on coaching but teaching isn’t for everyone. It is odd that the USPA feels that at a 100 jumps you are skillful enough to coach skydiving but not use a contour camera. It is also limiting the value of the coaching buy not giving them one of the most useful tools in a coaching toolbox. Maybe including camera training into the coaching program would not only allow access that tool earlier but encourage people to get into coaching that might not have otherwise. I do not feel that a 100-jump rating would make someone good enough to film tandems or use larger video or still camera. If it really is its own discipline it could have its own progression. Say for example; small format, large format, stills, and tandem. These are just the thoughts and ramblings of a new skydiver but I was wondering what some of the more experienced people might think. P.S. It might also be a good idea to require or recomend an AAD with the camera rating.
  8. About me Up until the summer of 2009 I was an elite level bicycle racer. Because of some health issues I had to stop racing (hopefully temporarily). Being an active person I searched for some other activity to keep me focused. I had failed to find anything for around a year and was beginning to get depressed. Then while on an extended business trip to Oklahoma this summer I decided that I was going to get my skydiving license. The main reason I decide to go was the cost at the local DZ. Where I live the only training method is AFF and the cost is over $3000 to get an A license. While I assume there are plenty of arguments on each side as to which method is better, cost was a big factor in my decision. The drop zone I was looking at had a good record and was listed on the USPA site. So I decided to sign up for the first jump class using the static line method. Finding the drop zone proved to be my first challenge. I assumed my GPS would have no problems finding an airport. Although the website for the DZ stated that it was at an airport that might be argued. It was more a place that an aircraft could land than where one should land. I will say that the pilots there proved to amaze me and I assume that since the place has been around for decades without any problems that it is perfectly safe. After a call to the drop zone I quickly found my way. I believe I was the first student to show up that day and did not know what to make of the place. The runway was nothing more than a strip of recently mowed grass and the facilities looked a bit dated. The hanger was carpeted wall to wall and had two old Cessna 182s parked in the middle. There were a dozen or so old couches and recliners around the perimeter with stains of unknown origins. I was quickly greeted by the older British fellow whom I had spoken with on the phone. He ranted a little about how he didn’t understand why people couldn’t read the direction on the web site and complained about GPS never finding his airport. Other student trickled in and we filled out our forms and started the class. Throughout the morning two other instructors made there way in and went over a couple of sections each. As the day went on the Oklahoma heat began to rise and settled in at around 110. With the heat came the wind and although we had finished the class we were grounded because of the wind. Although miserable there was a weird sense of being sent back in time. The only sounds were people talking and the slight sounds from the wind across the top of the hangar. It was nice to not have the constant chatter of radio or TV for a while. The planes were pushed out halfway through the day and some of the real skydivers showed up and clustered together and spoke, in what at the time seemed like a foreign language. It reminded me of when I started bike racing and listening to others talking about the sport. This not only brought a smile to my face but a sense of determination to become one of them. After expressing my desire to get my license I noticed a sense that people had doubt of my ambition. This doubt was later explained by witnessing others speak the same way only to never be seen again after their first jump. After spending several weeks in a hotel with little to do I jumped at the invitation to stay and drink some beers when the day was over. The sun set at the drop zone with out me stepping foot in an aircraft. The first night at the drop zone passed and I had already earned my nickname. I didn’t ask for a nickname or even expect one for a while. I had made it through several years of cycling without managing one and I have never been one to push for things like that. So it was to my surprise that I had earned one in a single day. The policy at that drop zone was that when the last load of the day landed the beer light would be turned on. And when that light turns on, I later learned, you better be prepared. I wasn’t prepared, I was dehydrated, hungry, and tried to keep up. That led to me getting very inebriated and I started telling stories. My stories were not the problem it was my inability to recognize the fact that I had a full beer every time I would swing my hands around, this resulted in a large quantity of beer being spilled. I will blame the high heat and probable dehydration on how amazingly drunk I got that first night. After that night I was dubbed “spills” and even acquired the logo of the wet floor sign which is destined to be a tattoo. After several months and several trips to Oklahoma, I had twenty jumps in my log book. I am not a natural flier and have encountered several obstacles along the way. In the beginning it looked as though I would have several hours of freefall time all racked up in 5 second increments because of a tendency I had of rolling onto my back when reaching for my pilot chute. I eventually worked my way past it and then got stuck on turning, which I still have yet to master. I breezed past flips and rolls and have started working on RW at my new drop zone. I have read some reviews about the drop zone I started at and some people where quite negative about how the place looked. I can say that after spending a summer at the place and learning about the people running it, that you can not judge a book by its cover. I was truly amazed at how objective the instructors could be, even after hanging out weekend after weekend they had no problem telling me that they thought I needed to redo a jump because my skill where not perfect. The first thing the instructors usually asked was how they thought I did during the jump. This led to a lot of self examination and improvement. I can truly say that I am confident in my abilities to not only skydive, at my current level, but to recognize my weaknesses and seek help to improve. I am glad I got to spend time there everyone was great. Hopefully I will have my A license in a week or two. But I am somewhat disappointed that I will not be able to finish at the drop zone I started. I am however looking forward to getting stamped by them when I visit. I can see how friendships created in this sport can have a unique bond. I guess that type of bond is established when someone does a pin check or teaches you how to save your own life. I look forward to continually learning and progressing through the sport.