FLYJACK

Blevins posted this.. Cooper sleuth Meyer Louie passes away...

Not sure if they rejected suspects only based on prints. I never used DNA or print results as the sole reason for elimination. It was probably more of a fishing expedition,,,

Very astute.. If the DNA is a dead end and the prints have no value,,, How do we put a suspect on the plane and solve this 100%?? This is the dilemma I have been working on..

That is a washed out photo and he looks younger there, no turkey neck.. I posted images that accurately show his forehead details.. Get real Ryan. No way those EXTREME forehead lines were NOT noticed by witnesses.. not one. Just those extreme forehead lines alone eliminates him. His nose is irrelevant. This is closer to the hijacking...

I don't have to find anything,, The FBI stated Sketch B is the most accurate. Your argument is speculative. The actual construction of your argument is flawed. It is nonsense and ignores the context. Your premise's are bad. The error is the ONLY reason for B,, nonsense You claim that 3 witnesses sitting together is somehow more reliable. False. This is never done, they can influence each other. Witnesses should be interviewed separately. and Murphy was liked by witnesses, he matches B very well below the sunglasses, sketch A does not. You have an opinion with nothing to back it up. B is more accurate, the evidence indicates it, the FBI said it and the process was more comprehensive. Murphy sketch A vs B... B is much better.

Cooper jumped at 8:11, I have new data and it is irrefutable. He did not jump later. I always felt it may have been as far south as Battleground but no longer. I won't post the data because it wouldn't matter to most and I am using it for my project. This is NOT Cooper's forehead Ryan.. These are not average forehead lines, these are extreme deep lines that go right down the temple. No Cooper witness mentioned forehead lines like this. Skip was not Cooper. Any objective person can understand this. This is the equivalent of Reca's nose.... and he doesn't have wavy, curly, marcelled hair... Skip may be an interesting guy but he clearly was NOT Cooper. Sketch A vs B... more nonsense.. Sketch B is the best likeness... It is essentially a widened version of A with the nose also proportionally widened. It is also aged and coloured. I have lots of evidence to support this maybe one day I'll post it but I don't think people really understand it with the misinformation out there.. sketch B was not created ONLY because of an error, that was incidental not causative. Ryan's argument that the error caused B and therefore B is not accurate is unfounded speculation. It is a logical non-sequitur. The FBI said B is the most accurate and I have undisclosed evidence that proves B is more accurate.. though still a composite sketch. The idea that a Cooper suspect must match A and not B is actually insane.

I have zero interest in Tosaw's opinions and actions... His contribution to the case is his book because he interviewed so many relevant people,, It is very accurate in that context, of course Cossey lied to him and there are some minor errors here and there... even Alice liked the book.. but overall it is a very important Cooper book.

Updated analysis Cooper left the plane between 20:11 and 20:12. While not conclusive it is very strong new evidence. If Cooper jumped then he could have drifted up to 6 miles if he pulled right away, or if he pulled late 1 mile drift and he might be virtually under the path as it has a 1 mile error. Depending on the wind direction at that location he could have landed just N of the Lewis R. I would estimate a 20:11 - 20:12 jump at 95%...

Tosaw named the people he spoke with, odd he didn't mention Bill.. but, point is if Mitchell boarded before Cooper that is why Cooper chose the left side...

In Tosaw's book the F-106's got behind flight 305 heading at 148 degrees that is SSE,, and essentially eliminates the Western flightpath.

Was Cooper the last to board or second to last?? and if he was second to last who was last? Flo, thought second to last.. ' Gregory though he might have been the last to board.. Tosaw's book Mitchell was before Cooper, but he didn't speak to Mitchell. he did speak to the stews. Mitchell wasn't sure.. It appears Cooper was likely second to last to board but after Mitchell, perhaps Gregory was last.. if so that may be why he would have chosen the left side.

Tosaw's book is very accurate but he did rely on others for info. Cossey assisted Tosaw for his book,,, and lied. Cossey given credit for assisting... This is a lie... to cover Cossey's conflation of Hayden's rigs with his personal rigs. More lies... from Cossey, claims he was paid $50 for Cooper's rig and the other rig was returned to him.

The argument was always that he took the matchbooks because of fingerprints.. nope That is false.. he left many potential sources for prints (cig butts, cups, magazine, tie,,, etc..) and even offered money to the stews.. Cooper did not care about prints, probably had prints obscured. If he didn't care about prints then why take the matchbook he had brought... the only reason I can think of is it had writing in it and that is supported in the files. Smokers often used matchbooks to write notes.. before smartphones

Notes in the matchbook... that is why he took it.

The TBAR serial numbers are listed in the FBI files, there are 315 bill SN's listed but many are partials that means two partial numbers could have been one bill. The 280 was an estimate.. there were reports one packet was smaller than the other two. Later, partial serial numbers were combined or deciphered and a bill serial number completed, not new bills found. There were not 300 bill's fully identified. This has been a conflation of two different measures.. the bill estimate of 280 and bill SN's confirmed. You can't add 20 new serial numbers to the bill estimate. Confirming 20 bills later does not add to the total number of bills it adds to the bill SN's completed.