FLYJACK

Actually, you don't know what Cooper said,, we have an agents notes for what Tina recalled... you did not hear Cooper speak. If Tina was accurate, "nice country" can mean geographically or a characteristic of the people from that place. If you disagree that is a possibility that is fine but it is an opinion, not a fact. When you guys lie and make false claims as you both did that is being dishonest.

As far as I am concerned there is no legit dispute,,, you guys are expressing a claim of knowledge that you do not possess. You both claim to know what Cooper meant. Ironically, both of you lied and claimed I was claiming to know what Cooper meant even though I clearly said otherwise.. Only Cooper knows. Cooper could have meant the geography or the people from that place.. Fact is.. NICE was a characteristic of the people from Minnesota prior to NORJAK.. What I find interesting is that the underlying motive for the nice behaviour changed. After NORJAK it was used to promote tourism... Of course Minnesotan people didn't suddenly become nice after NORJAK, it was there well before.. In the 60's it was masking racism.. if Cooper knew that perhaps he was referring to it.

Glad to hear it... we agree. POI is nonsense. Nobody can put a suspect on the plane,,, all we have is circumstantial... some better than others. My worry is that because of the poor FBI evidence there is no way to put a suspect on the plane. Solving to that level may be impossible.

Not my invention.. country can be the physical geography or a place... You don't know what Cooper meant.. stop pretending you do.

I was pointing out a FACT in the image,,, he parted his hair on both sides. Clearly, you have a problem with facts.

What are you talking about,, "Nice" is a characteristic of the people from that area and it predates NORJAK by a long shot.. that is the issue.

I never said he was virtually bald,,, why do you have to always lie,, is that how you were trained. I noticed in the image his hair was parted on BOTH sides because it was so thin.. The image speaks for itself,, It is clear you need to discredit the messenger because you can't defend it but it doesn't change the facts.. really amateur stuff Ryan.

I never expect you to but you said you would admit you were wrong if Minnesota "nice" existed before NORJAK.. It did, you lied again and your word is mud.

So Hall is now a suspect, I thought he was POI or is that just politically correct nonsense. It is really difficult to actually eliminate a suspect with facts... most people use opinion. Ironically, the less you know the harder it can be.. but Hall can be eliminated with those many bumps dimpled chin and severe forehead and eye wrinkles. Fortunately we have that for Hall, but without that it comes down to an opinion.. Lots of suspects can't be eliminated but are not Cooper. If we ignore the facial features that eliminate him,, IMO he still was not Cooper.. There is no real evidence for him and he was known to the CIA and FBI pre Norjak,, He was high profile in the Intel community and had many shady ways to make money... He doesn't fit Cooper's profile. Cooper was a nobody, a loner. Those obvious facial features eliminate him,, anyone who isn't biased can see it.

Now you change the goalpost to avoid responsibility. The verbiage is not the issue, the fact that the people from Minnesota were well known as "nice" before NORJAK is.. and you were wrong. TIP.. never trust Georger's quick google search. You can't prove Cooper meant "nice" geography... maybe he did, we don't know.

Again strawmanning.. Hahneman has nothing to with Skip Hall's facial bumps and severe wrinkles.. They exist. Deal with it.

Wholly dishonest Ryan. That is a crap photo.

Of course you don't actually grasp the issue.. and are gaslighting. You don't know what Cooper meant. I have always said he could have been describing the geography or the characteristics of the people.. You still haven't admitted you were wrong..

Not a minor physical detail... grow up. Those bumps on his face and severe wrinkles are unique enough that they would not be missed by witnesses.

Sure, Limbach is playing semantics.. everyone who investigates a suspect gets attacked for being biased.. to mitigate that just change the language and pretend otherwise. Calling a suspect a POI is defence to being accused of bias.. Of course it isn't, it is a cheap parlour trick.. of course Limbach is pushing Cooper as a suspect.. Like Ryan claiming he isn't biased because he doesn't have a suspect, it is nonsense. and I agree, nothing wrong with having a suspect... how else do you vet people and move the case.. but having a suspect is treated with hate and disdain.. pretty stupid. The problem is that obviously Hall was not Cooper based on the facts and nobody has the integrity to say so.