rybco

Interesting to see this thread. I'v never heard of this concept until last week when family members were boasting about how they deliberately abuse this system just to bring their dog along. However, in the same week, I learned of another woman that brings her dog along for emotional support. I figured she was abusing the system as well, but it's now apparent that tho she's extremely intelligent, she's also emotional retarded as well. I tried several times to make friends with her little chihuahua, but to no avail. finally the dog wanted to come up to me when I was busy eating. I jokingly said, "no, you had your chance." The emotionally retarded emotional support dog owner got very defensive and proceeded to lecture me on giving people second chances. . .

There is no good reason to blow this out of proportion. Adam Shifft is simply asking for a February 5th re-vote on whether or not the modified memo should be released to the public or not. House Intelligence Committee spokesman, Jack Langer, said that the modifications were due to grammatical fixes and several edits requested by the FBI and the minority themselves. Yet, some ANONYMOUS source said that the edits watered down the majority's assertions in the memo. If that's true, why would the majority now vote against releasing a memo they already approved, especially if the modified memo makes them look even better? It's clear that this is just a typical legal tactic on part of Adam "Shiffty" to delay the release of the memo, modified or not.