olofscience
-
Content
2,510 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
10 -
Feedback
N/A
Everything posted by olofscience
-
To be fair, left wing crazies also somehow support Putin. They still seem to think that Russia is still communist...
-
Nobody's even asking for negotiations. Even with them complaining about power cuts, they're not asking to even vote on negotiations. Even from the articles you linked. Just you, because you're pro-Putin. They're asking for more help from the west, and more weapons.
-
Are you Ukranian in Ukraine? If not, you don't speak for them. If they want to negotiate, they'll ask for it. Not through you, a random Florida man.
-
Ukraine is asking for more air defence weapons, not negotiations. The only one asking for negotiations, is you. Hope Putin's paying you well.
-
I also quite doubt your ability to do any "number crunching" given your zero knowledge of the concept of probability...
-
Targeting energy facilities isn't "bombing them back into the Stone Age". At best, it's back to the 1800s when there wasn't any electricity. Any signs that Ukrainians are desperate to negotiate? Nope. Oh, and Russia is about to lose Kherson.
-
I wasn't aware of the Fox news coverage of Liz Truss, but apparently here's a compilation: https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cj_k2kggcAx
-
"Increase revenue by cutting 75% of staff" Profits, maybe, but I think this will be as effective in increasing revenue as Liz Truss' strategy of "growing the UK economy".
-
I'm actually interested in hearing his justification for his conclusion, mainly: what his criticism of the papers were (methodology, equipment, sample size, etc?) what his criteria for "conclusive" was (p<0.05?) But I expect he won't be saying anything, for obvious reasons. As for the discussion I wasn't attacking him, I was just backing up my hypothesis (that he didn't read it) with evidence.
-
The lettuce won!
-
He rarely reads more than the title, so clearly reading takes huge effort for him. He interprets articles as supporting his point when they're the complete opposite. "War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength" - to him it's an instruction manual, not a cautionary tale.
-
Nope. Nice try. Bluffing as usual.
-
translation: Brent couldn't read the paper. Didn't make it past the title. edit: and also: as a consequence of the above - he doesn't have any idea whether they're conclusive or not.
-
You've already shown your inability to read scientific papers here. Good luck getting past the titles...
-
You need to go and look up what probability is. Meanwhile in the Pacific, there's been cyclone after cyclone.
-
Fair enough.
-
"the adult at 10 Downing St." has crashed the UK economy within a month of getting into power and will probably be kicked out soon. And you probably still think the policies you support are the financially sensible ones
-
Your conclusions are jumping all over the place. You said "wind and solar will never replace coal and gas", I asked why, and you basically said "we use too much energy, it's impossible". Then another random attack on scientists without any evidence, well keep digging won't you...
-
Thanks. You could have just started with that, and you know, not said the other things.
-
But you're criticising their statements, which is about the science. All you're doing is hinting that they're just money-grabbers without actually providing any argument against their statement, furthermore, without any proof of their financial corruption. You're even doing it in a subtle way, which I think is quite cowardly as compared to an open accusation backed up with evidence.
-
...and this conclusion is based on?
-
After you publish your scientific paper.
-
Although some people in Labour are now getting worried that by the time the Tories hand over power, the economy would have been trashed so much that they'll get blamed for it. Lots of FX traders predicting USD-GBP parity by November. Even with the last U-turn there's still a £42 billion gap in the budget. This will probably get worse before it gets better...
-
I've repeatedly stated my support for nuclear energy and nuclear research. Even Greta Thunberg has stated support for nuclear. But this is where you don't make sense. Nuclear energy is the most expensive energy per MWh in the world. When I pointed that out to another member of the right (metalslug) he started evading, then completely flipped and got angry. I'm a fan of nuclear, especially nuclear fusion. I was even considering getting involved with the ITER project in France. But looking at the physics made me realise it will NEVER be cheap. We should still spend the money, but if you're concerned about the costs then you're lying to yourself that nuclear is the answer. You're just using it to blame the left to make yourself feel better.
-
So, climate change being the reason for the observed phenomenon is NOT obvious, but money being motivations for those scientists IS obvious? Didn't know you were an expert in their field, why don't YOU publish a research paper showing that p > 0.05 to prove that they're just money grabbers? I won't hold my breath...
