Lickablecode

Got the same error too. Is this error from a rule violation (can only renew x times) or is this a bug?

resellerratings.com is great. As a rule of thumb, I don't order from a website that does not list an actual street address on their website. Sellers that do not list a street address either on their main page, or on the "contact us" page are obviously trying to hide something. Preferably, they should have an actual store room, meaning they are real people with real customers.

My PC 109 just broke, so I have no use for the docking station. Shoot me an email....

When has a politician EVER been for the people?

I wouldn't bother arguing. The ignorant, no matter how educated, will always be ignorant. More importantly, they will always debate about which they have no experience or expertise. Champu couldn't have said it any better: http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2449858;#2449858

Too bad Canon doesn't make digital backs. If they did, one would be on my helmet right now. That would be awesome. If money really isn't an issue, tell him to get the 1Ds mkII, then ask to borrow it.

I have yet to meet someone who went to PRISON for a minor possession of a controlled substance. And even if they were sending hordes of dopers to prison, I doubt they would make room for them by releasing violent criminals. I think the bureaucracy of the system is likely to blame.

I hate Kazakhstan. There. Now it can stay.

What's that smell? And why isn't there a Troll-Only forum where they can anonymously troll each other all day with posts such as "OMG, Argus had a misfire," or "Da'Kine rags stole my money," and "I have 50 jumps and am flying a velocity." Oh wait, that almost sounds like Speakers Corner....

There's no need to attack my reading ability. My comment on your post was because I was utterly confused why you chose to respond to my argument (that religion had nothing to do with this) by stating a phenomena (because religious whackos think that only homosexuals get AIDS) which has nothing to do with this incident. And more importantly, because that belief largely died in the 80's along with David Bowie and digital watches.

Wow. It took so much concentration from me to figure out what you were saying that I sneezed and my brain is now spackled onto my monitor. Seriously though.

Thanks for the clarification (and the red herring), but I know what he was trying to say. And he certainly did not say anything about right wing Republicans. What I was trying to say was that it would be illogical to assume that religion had anything to with this, to assume that this teacher was religious, and to assume that his mistakes were a consequence of his faith. Did I lose you? Here, I'll break it down... 1.) I have never seen any evidence that suggest that religious (or republicans) are less educated on blood-borne pathogens. If there is evidence, then I'd like to see it. 2.) If the religious are unaware of the hazards of blood-born diseases, and this teacher made a mistake that would suggest he wasn't aware of these consequences. It would be illogical to conclude that this teacher is a religious whacko. This logic is called Affirming the Consequent. Look it up.

Anything that defines any particular substance as the most toxic substance, is inherently wrong. It's a popular fact that nothing can be regarded as the most, very few things are the least, and most certainly, nothing is ever always.

I'm surprised you even go to class. I haven't been to a Micro class since this year started. I'll occasionally show up to Path, but even then, there are some things best learned on your own.

I don't see how religion is involved in this mistake.