
borg2050
Members-
Content
25 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Feedback
0%
Community Reputation
0 NeutralGear
-
Main Canopy Size
170
-
AAD
Cypres
Jump Profile
-
Home DZ
Z-Hills Skydive City
-
License
B
-
Licensing Organization
USPA
-
Number of Jumps
90
-
Why Skydive City(Z-Hills) is better than Skydive Deland
borg2050 replied to stitch's topic in The Bonfire
41. the El Camino 42. Khan riding a giraffe unicycle -
I agree with you about smoking and driving. Not that I recommend smoking and driving, but they are totally different. Relative to alcohol, cannabis doesn't effect your driving. It mostly affects your sense of direction and not coordination/reaction speed. I know plenty of stoners that are very good drivers and have never had an accident. Also, there is one guy that I know that speeds whenever he doesn't smoke. However, I would not reccomend it for skydiving mainly because the skydiver may not recognize the landing zone, may forget something during a mal, black out because of the lowered blood pressure (especially during a bad spinning mal, I can only imagine), or loose altitude awareness. Its really just not a good idea. I should also bring up ciggarettes. Obviously, this doesn't apply to regular smokers. Does anyone remember the first time they tried one? Remember the sudden loss of coordination and lightheadedness that came with it? I don't see anyone questioning ciggarette smoking.
-
I had the same problem as you until I downsized and started renting non-student gear. Only then, did the slow flare make sense to me. I haven't had a bad landing since AFF. Do what feels right.
-
I would have to agree, considering that I forgot to pull on AFF1.
-
I haven't had that one, but something similar. One of my professors (pre-calc) thought that you had to hold your breath because "the pressure against the lungs would be too great when you open your mouth."
-
So that's why the packers at my DZ are always telling me, "Neatness counts."
-
Opinions wanted about a 2-step RSL procedure
borg2050 replied to borg2050's topic in Safety and Training
This discussion is filled with a plethora of GOOD arguments. Throughout this discussion, I have noticed a trend. No matter how bad the RSL could possibly be, it seems that everyone agrees that people with jump numbers similar to mine should use the RSL. You may not use one, but you trust it with the life of your wife. I think that says something. Not to mention the very reason they were created: jumpers managed to cut away...but not pull the reserve. I don't know why that happens, and I really don't know how it happens to experts. As for now, I'm going to use the RSL until I can get the skyhook system. I am VERY thankful to ALL of the posters of this thread. I feel that DZ.com is a great resource and gateway to speaking with the experts of the sport. -
Opinions wanted about a 2-step RSL procedure
borg2050 replied to borg2050's topic in Safety and Training
Well... you never know what you're going to get when you deploy. Odds are high you'll get a good canopy, but don't get complacent because you have a light wingloading. I jump a Sabre2 loaded about exactly the same as your Spectre. I never thought my first cutaway would be from a violent spinner. Guess what? My first cutaway was from a violent spinner. It was chaotic, frantic, and frightening to me. I also had utmost confidence that I would execute my EPs without a problem. Guess what? I missed my cutaway handle twice before I pulled it. I also lost sight of my reserve handle and watched the RSL beat me to it as I located it under my chin. I'm not a bad skydiver, borg. I'm not slow physically or mentally. Bad sh!t happens to good people. Again... please consider the advice a lot of people who know a hell of a lot more than I do are giving you. Connect that RSL until you have first hand experience with a mal then give yourself a chance to re-evaluate. I'm swaying so much. Now it seems I want the RSL. -
Opinions wanted about a 2-step RSL procedure
borg2050 replied to borg2050's topic in Safety and Training
You wanna bet your life on it? Hrmm...No! Would I want to have my reserve out if I had one of those...probably. It would seem that one handle would be better than two in that situation because of the loss of blood to the brain under a violently spinning canopy. I think Billvon said something about that a few posts back. I've been jumping the student Spectres and now you tell me they aren't mellow. -
Opinions wanted about a 2-step RSL procedure
borg2050 replied to borg2050's topic in Safety and Training
Interesting... -
Opinions wanted about a 2-step RSL procedure
borg2050 replied to borg2050's topic in Safety and Training
I would have to agree with you on that. I mean, I can't see myself getting severe line twists with a wing loading of .96 -
Opinions wanted about a 2-step RSL procedure
borg2050 replied to borg2050's topic in Safety and Training
I think that I'm adept enough to pull another large handle when required, but not adept enough to find that little RSL cable and disconnect it without accidently pulling on it, while having a malfunction that requires a disconnect. -
Opinions wanted about a 2-step RSL procedure
borg2050 replied to borg2050's topic in Safety and Training
I'm not so sure that all of those skydivers who cut away too low would have been saved by an RSL. If you are going to be cutting away so low, you still have to give the RSL enough time to deploy the reserve. It is nice to have if you are in the situation where you wouldn't be able to cut away and deploy the reserve fast enough, but are still high enough above the ground that you may live. That time period (I'm assuming) may not be any longer than 2-3 seconds. -
Opinions wanted about a 2-step RSL procedure
borg2050 replied to borg2050's topic in Safety and Training
On this we agree....And remember I don't like RSL's, so thats saying something. It makes sense to me that nobody wants to be the one who tells an inexperienced jumper not to use an RSL. I put more trust in myself than the RSL. I am assuming I will always pull my reserve after a cutaway (who wouldn't?). Howver, in the case of a canopy collision upon deployment, I wouldn't want my reserve out just yet. Again, I am putting more trust in myself than the RSL. -
Opinions wanted about a 2-step RSL procedure
borg2050 replied to borg2050's topic in Safety and Training
You don't know how an RSL works then. A low collision is one of the few times I would WANT an RSL. Also you have very little chance of an entaglement up high. No offense, I don't like RSL's one little bit, but your logic is bad here. You worry about collisions? Then look around a bunch under canopy. Two out? Maintain your gear. Err...did you read my posts? Its pretty obvious that I would want an RSL for anything that is low-altitude. But higher up, I would want a choice for cutting away without the reserve being deployed immediately.