tkhayes

Sure, because FOX wrote out all those checks for settlements without doing even the slightest bit of their own investigations or looking into whether Bill O was a harassing pig or not. they just assumed he was innocent and wrote the check anyway.... got it. Reminder that Bill O'Reilly walks away with likely tens of millions of dollars, no criminal charges, no admission of any wrongdoing, this is a financial and civil settlement. Of course, you thinking that somehow Clinton should have gone to jail while Bill O'Reilly is 'falsely accused' already shows your bias. I wonder where you get your belief structure....hmm, I wonder...... herein lieth the problem with men that carry bibles....

I like going fast. I am 56, overweight, tried to upsize my canopies because of age and such, tried several new canopies Went back to a Katana 150 and decided...."I like going fast"

that is a stretch...I love how everything has to be an absolute lie or the absolute truth and nothing in between. "Sonnyblu, Give me your guns" "OK, here's my guns" "Is that all of them?" "Yes" "Hey friend of Sonnyblu, is that all his guns?" "Yes" turns out you hid a gun so when asked "Hey TK, does Sonnyblu have any guns?" "No, he gave them all to me" "YOU'RE A FUCKING LIAR!! YOU ARE JUST TRYING TO TAKE CREDIT FOR GETTING THOSE GUNS!!" when in fact, sonnyblu was actually the one lying. Apparently you have never spent any time in a real legal setting to understand what lying really is. BTW, your commander in chief is the guy in charge now and is the biggest fucking liar to ever hit the whitehouse, bar none, in the history of the republic. Since you seem to be keeping track of lies. I hope you started your list.

narcissistic sociopaths do not need polls or approval, they are always right and always infallible by default.

The reason for the proposed ban against a select few countries isn't because of widespread molestation attacks. . . Agreed, but it adds fuel to the fire and as I have stated has no basis in reality without applying a tremendous amount of bias. Just like applying a tremendous amount of bias when stating that they are all terrorists, or jihadists and are all out to kill us when creating immigration policy. It has no statistical basis in fact, but does have anecdotal value. But then completely ignores the numbers of terrorist attacks committed by white Christian Americans every year for example.

I'm not calling for a banning. But at least the Catholic Church has received plenty of negative press for their actions that hopefully improved the situation. I never said anything about shutting down institutions. I want want to understand why. Great, but how can we prevent it? If there are cultural/parental issue that need be addressed through the use of mental health for refugees, then that would be a good starting point. These families have gone through a lot - they might need a lot more than cash and a job at some yogurt factory. No, 'you' may not be calling for a ban, but plenty of people are. So banning muslims for the actions of a few while NOT banning Catholics for the actions of a few shows show paradox, hypocrisy and bias And the 'institutions I suggest are the Catholic Church as once example and refugees/immigrants as another 'institution'

THAT is fucking funny.....

I am not suggesting that it is not news or even that it did not happen. But 'policy' comes from systemic or repeated societal issues, not from anecdotal incidents. No one called for the banning of Catholic churches, which arguably has done more systemic raping than any single entity in the history of modern civilization Action taken upon a group of people or policy implemented based upon a single or even rare incidents is called 'knee-jerk' and does nothing to solve the thousands of other issues you are consciously ignoring, even though they are EXACTLY the same problem. In other words, if you care about children getting raped and want institutions shut down because of children getting raped, then I would ask for consistency across all platforms where children are getting raped.... we already have a system to deal with the consequences of it - it is called the criminal justice system, which investigates, hunts down, captures and convicts the offenders.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-edva/pr/former-fox-news-commentator-pleads-guilty-fraud Of course Fox was quick to state that he never worked for them and was never paid by them....but that guy was on the channel almost weekly for 10 years. Hire slowly...fire quickly - society could use a lot more of that.

Which is not a basis for immigration policy...or anything else actually. It is simply an anecdotal story about something that happened. spinning it into 'hatred' is EXACTLY what Breitbart does very well. And you and far too many others bought it.

for me it was my 10th jump. no fear, excitement. for most I think 10-30 jumps is where it is at. I think if you get to 200 jumps and are still 'scared', methinks you might want to reconsider what you are doing. This is supposed to be fun, why would you do something that you are afraid of doing?

I wonder what it would have cost United just to go across the field to one of the small carriers, like Talon or ORD and charter a plane to move their staff to wherever they needed to go. I somehow bet it was less that the stock tanking they took yesterday. It's OK, their stock will rebound as well shortly, maybe not to 100% but capitalists cannot stand passing up a bargain priced stock.

agreed. If you wanted to project strength, at the very least you would have leveled the airbase. Or perhaps lobbed a few missiles within a couple blocks of Assad's palace to 'send the message' that you can get to him any time you want.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dates_predicted_for_apocalyptic_events Add yours to the end of the list I guess....

My email to Rep Gus Billirakis today: Your fake outrage over Syria is about the lowest form of hypocrisy left in the Congress today. 4 years ago, gas attacks were conducted in Syria and you, as a member of Congress REFUSED to do anything about it. And now, somehow you are "outraged". You are supposedly pro-life and supporting a cause at home, but tens of thousands of children can die in foreign countries, yet you will block ANY refugee immigration? So let me get this straight....it is OK for hundreds of thousands of people to die in Syria using conventional weapons but when chemical weapons are used (only while your President is in power) you suddenly are all concerned about it? It is sad, sickening and disgusting. I am revolted by your very words. You are truly one of the reasons that we have Islamic extremists in the world.

I do not think that 'liberals' are caught up at all. It is not a 'liberal view' that Trump is a puppet of the Russians. That is a fringe view, I am not familiar with. And promoting that theory sounds like a conservative fringe view as well. The mainstream view, both conservative and liberal is that Putin did not want Hillary in, that he put up a well-constructed fake news campaign and hacker style attacks to help that happen. And that some of (at least) Trump's campaign people were quite likely aware of and assisting in that work. And those are actually crimes and 'liberals' and some conservatives would like investigated. Going the extra step to state that liberals think Putin is controlling the US government actually shows a level of ignorance and paranoia on the conservative side....akin to the 'liberal puppet govt theory' I think most of the USA is glad that Trump is doing something in Syria, most wish Obama did as well, but this is not 'Obama's' call, he specifically asked Congress for resolutions and discussion and was shut down. Not the fault of Obama, but the fault of the dysfunctional congress we have had for some decades now. It is not the President's fault when congress openly committed to making sure Obama never got anything done. and I expect most of the USA, while appreciative of action in Syria, has no clue what happens next, whether or not the Russians were forewarned of the attack, whether or not this will start a war, whether we will put boots on the ground or how the rest of the world will respond, or whether this will make any shred of difference in the conflict. and I expect Trump does not know that either...because he's a fucking idiot. throw enough darts at a dartboard and you are bound to get a bullseye eventually. Good for Trump, he's still a fucking idiot. i am putting my money on "this will have little effect on the conflict but might stop whomever from using Sarin gas for a couple more years". In other words, we are just fine with hundreds of thousands of people dying at the hands of conventional weapons, but not OK with nerve agents..... But I am also not willing to wage another trillion dollar war just so Trump and Putin can wag their tiny penises at each other.

apparently your lord Trump, saviour of the American right wing, disagrees with your assessment that the rebels did it.... Apology accepted.

You still have not answered his question. Do you or do you not think that Trump has lied? Yes or no pretty simple...even you can manage that.

https://forums.yahoo.net/t5/Features-and-settings/Stop-asking-me-to-turn-off-less-secure-access-to-my-inbox/td-p/136063

That is not what I am saying. There is no absolute proof that he lied about anything. there is plenty of evidence to support that he did and he was impeached. You are denying that the Trump campaign was involved with Russia because you are demanding absolute irrefutable proof otherwise you biased belief structure will not allow you to comprehend the evidence that supports the likelihood that it happened. There is no proof of gravity either, but there is overwhelming evidence that it exists. But you are absolutely certain (I expect) about your claims about Rice. A more accurate statement might be 'I believe', instead of 'that's a fact'.

Rubbish. The vested interest that the Government has is winning and maintaining a ruthless dictatorship, kinda of like Russia and Syria.

Susan Rice has not asked for immunity from prosecution. Michael Flynn has. That should tell you something. But probably not if your belief structure is that you can dismiss tons of evidence of wrong doing with the Trump campaign but make a blanket claim that Susan Rice is a known liar using similar levels of evidence.....

No, there is no proof that Bill Clinton lied. But there is plenty of evidence that he did. You do not understand the difference apparently. There is in fact no proof that you are sitting at a computer reading this...there is only evidence that you are doing that.

actually NONE of the links gave conclusive evidence. Also none of them gave conclusive evidence of your claim that the rebels did it either. But it did reference MANY governmental investigations and many agency investigations from around the world that the MOST LIKELY culprit was the Assad govt. You of course are allowed to dismiss the conclusions of many for the conclusions of one. I am I am equally allowed to dismiss your 'one' opinion with the overwhelming conclusions of the many. Tired of arguing with anonymous trolls. joined recently? No name, no identity, no nothing - that makes you well, described in your profile I guess.....and not worthy of my attention for sure.

But they are still involved in the intelligence, the decisions that come out of it, the details within it. What you are saying is that the Police Commissioner is never aware, nor involved in the investigation by the staff of the police department. That is patently false. Cherry picking the roles and compartmentalizing for your convenience without any basis in fact for your assumption In your opinion. Show us the statutes she has violated please and the basis for it. People are free to be armchair critics of how they think the internal govt works. I expect when the daily intelligence briefings happen at many levels of many departments within various branches of the governments, that the identities of those involved are routinely discussed. Why? Because it might be pertinent to the investigation, that's why.