tkhayes

Are they selling baby parts? They are not baby parts. Baby has a specific legal and medical definition. you do not get to redefine it to suit your own needs. Fetus also has a specific legal and medical definition. you do not get to redefine it to suit your needs either.

Human tissue is used in research all the time. You and your kind are merely trying to spin an ordinary non issue to try and make it support your narrow moral beliefs. I support your right to your beliefs, but there is no smoke, let alone fire here. So to answer you question, yes, it is OK to provide fetal tissue to genuine researchers on a cost recovery basis. Legal too. My kind? Fucking funny shit dude! Anyway I know about tissue and research so your high horse failed you As for my narrow moral beliefs? Damn right I am entitled to them But the videos show for profits dealings So now, "you and your kind" will try and spin this to support your wide open moral beliefs And yes, you are entitled to your beliefs up until the point babies are murdered for profit! They are murdering babies. Baby has a specific legal and medical definition. you do not get to redefine it to suit your own needs. Fetus also has a specific legal and medical definition. you do not get to redefine it to suit your needs either.

Abortion is ok, whats next? Oh Selling baby organs for profit Now that is one hell of business to be in dont you think? Again I want FEDERAL money out of it Period They are not baby organs. Baby has a specific legal and medical definition. you do not get to redefine it to suit your own needs. Fetus also has a specific legal and medical definition. you do not get to redefine it to suit your needs either.

Yup, just like when somebody croaks they discuss how best to preserve the organs for donation. Since the aborted tissue is not viable, it can be traded for research. I am a little confused though. You tend to rant a rave about how the government should be run as a business. Now this process is being run as a business and you are all bent out of shape. Let me guess, you want to make sure legislation is passed to ensure this is completely illegal and no longer in a grey zone? Your attempt at mind reading fails you as per usual You should really give up trying as you consistently are wrong But this is your attempt at diversion, I know I know The only thing I want? Enforce the federal law against making profit selling baby parts and No federal tax dollars for Planned Parenthood Very simple oh misguided one They are not baby parts. Baby has a specific legal and medical definition. you do not get to redefine it to suit your own needs. Fetus also has a specific legal and medical definition. you do not get to redefine it to suit your needs either.

And that is all it is; an opinion. Mine is substantially different than yours. Have a good day, Jerry Baumchen So selling baby parts is ok with you Ahhhhhh Ok They are not baby parts. Baby has a specific legal and medical definition. you do not get to redefine it to suit your own needs. Fetus also has a specific legal and medical definition. you do not get to redefine it to suit your needs either.

that is true, the USB could be the option as well, or the DVD, with the upload being the baseline. I think I would still stick to 720P and not full HD, it would save download and upload and processing times on all the platforms, although if your plan is to upload, there is not real time crunch like a 20 minute call presents.

I am leaning towards uploading videos. We already have Google drive, whether we use that or Dropbox, whatever....it only makes sense these day to do it that way and change $5 more if they want a DVD. And I have practically unlimited internet bandwidth and a 12TB network storage box so we can hold onto thousands of videos for some period of time anyway, I may as well use it.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener-waterloo/kitchener-women-say-they-were-stopped-by-police-for-cycling-topless-1.3169479 now legal in most if not all of Canada. In the USA, about half the country would flip out. In so many other countries, girls with last names of Mohammed would be stoned to death for this. Never mind Salman Rushdie, where's the fatwa for this behavior? Good for them. I do believe that one of the ways of defeating Islamic extremism would be to show more and more depictions of allah and more and more women's bodies. Until they get used to it. probably more effective than bombs and soldiers. However equally shameful of me to attempt to tie this to religion at all. More of a statement/comment on differences in societies. These girls are probably no more islamic than i am christian.

+1

Are they selling baby parts? worse than that, they are murdering civilians in war zones and then letting the bodies and all those good parts go to waste.....

I never suggested that your scenario never happened. I said you were cherry picking specific scenarios to support a broad statement.

You being grossed out has little to do with the morality or lawlessness of anything. Maybe you are just a sissy. I have tended to a few bounce scenes, so it does not bother me at all.

paid for by taxes from those religious organizations.

And that is exactly what they did. they sold at cost and made no profit.....THEREFORE....making it legal. I think there is a small segment of the US military that are sick and depraved people. perhaps we should defund the entire US military for the same logic no?

I probably will, but I do not use it for anything important. I run a VmWare virtual windows 8.1 machine on my Mac just to run Quicken. Also gives me a chance to test the shit and see it to decide whether I want to migrate at the office as well. Windows 7 to 8 was pretty painful. 7 still at work and an old 2003 server, but plans to go to latest server releases this summer.

now you are just cherry picking selective scenarios in an attempt to cover for the very broad statement that you made earlier. It CAN and it HAS been done very successfully on many fronts many times. Notice I did not make any blanket statements that it ALWAYS WORKS in EVERY CASE. but you said it would likely fail horribly. There are hundreds if not thousands of scenarios where the leaders of organizations, governmental, small, large, regional, business, civilian and or military have not been specifically experienced in the field that they oversee. And done it successfully with good outcomes.

I disagree. I can see where that opinion could be derived, but I think the more accurate conclusion would be "In most departments in the US this would fail horribly in the current environment that we have...."

so you're saying that something will come out of this testimony that will take the outcome from 'no wrong doing' in all the previous investigations to 'finding of criminal behavior worthy of prosecution' in this one? By your own account of the foreseen events, you are basically saying that everyone involved in every previous investigation was likely criminally incompetent.

Your absolute refusal to accept the outcomes of the investigations when it stares you right in the face is breathtaking.... fixed that for you

There is a lot of good ideas behind that. leadership does not necessarily need to have experience in the field, but the ability to see the vision and mission statement. I remember an article a long long time ago talking about Norway (I think Norway) and the government agency that was in charge of the oil industry at govt levels. handling taxes, environmental and regulatory issues etc. The person in charge was a guy with a PhD in philosophy....not an oil industry crony. had absolutely zero experience in the oil industry.

that means you did not try hard enough and you will burn in hell forever.

No he doesn't. According to your own doctrine, he gave us free will. He could not possibly know my heart nor know if I am going to change my mind at any particular instance in time. more paradox in religion. imagine that.

i have always agreed with this philosophy. While admirable, the goal of keeping our police 'safe' by arming them to the teeth and teaching them combat techniques, the 'need' to be in control, and the use of overwhelming force in every situation has consequences for the average citizen. If you ask a plumber for a solution, you will get a plumbers solution. Likewise with the police. so many 911 calls get escalated into deadly confrontations that simply did not need to be. That is not the fault of the officer on the scene necessarily, more of a systemic fault at the very core of how we define police work and train them to respond. shooting family pets. killing people for being drunk, high, or just having a mental moment. piling 5 officers on top of someone for 'not co-operating'. this list goes on. All of these things come directly from the training they receive and the legislation that has been passed supporting these behaviors.

opening shock? What about the massive bacterial infections from whatever you pick up in the water?

+1