slk2go

Members
  • Content

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Feedback

    0%

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

Gear

  • Main Canopy Size
    190
  • Reserve Canopy Size
    176
  • AAD
    Cypres

Jump Profile

  • Home DZ
    Chambersburg Skydiving Center
  • License
    A
  • Licensing Organization
    USPA
  • Number of Jumps
    62
  • Years in Sport
    3
  • First Choice Discipline
    Formation Skydiving
  1. This may come a bit late as I have stumbled upon this thread a year after it's most recent activity. But anyhow I will give my 2 cents. Not on scuba on the pulling at 4500+ ordeal rather. I only have 65 jumps and an A license but I believe I have learned alot on this topic. I have gone from what I consider one of the most conservative dropzones (Chambersburg) to one of the most care free dropzones (The Ranch). Chambersburg requires aads and is a firm believer of developing good skills and working at your own pace. I love it there and consider it my home. The ranch well if you don't know the rep there you haven't been in the sport very long. I am not critisizing either I love being at both places and the ranch is becoming my second home dz but there are issues that come about when jumping tow very different dzs especially when you have been trained at one and expect similar operations at every other dz. i.e. I am 205 out the door and at chambersburg many had suggested a 210 sil as a first canopy, easy to pack fairly for4giving etc. I get to the ranch and am bsing about gear choices and people can't believe I would even consider something larger than a 190 saber2. Some places encourage you to progress by pushing your limits others encourage you to be conservative and progress in a safes slow fashion. I am a hippocrit I push friends to progress by pushing their limits in skiing yet am very conservative in the air. Back to the point: A high pull of 4-5k at chambersburg is discouraged for a new comer "take your time find the dz learn your canopy is the mantra" the same pull altitude at the ranch and you are looked at like a lepper. I don't think either is wrong one pushes you to become more comfortable in less perfect situations the other allows you to be relaxed and allows for more error. I believe the biggest issue is in training programs. At chambersburg I was never told " we are very conservative and we encourage conservative progression but be aware at other dzs you may need to adjust due to the following factors. Same goes for the ranch everyone I have met who got their license there seems to think that pulling low down sizing fast etc. no aad required etc. is the norm. I think in that case students should be warned that 'hey we are relaxed and everything goes but when you go somewhere else be prepared that people may be more conservative and don't get to crazy before you test the waters. I don't think either is right or worng I just think there should be a 5-10 minute discussion on cultural issues that may arrise when visiting other dropzones, before you get your A license. Same goes for DZ control The ranch no rules and no concerns, at chambersburg you had best bet JR or Kathy has their eye on you and what you are doind, jumping, etc. neither is a bad way to do things just different. Once again I am a rookie and what the hell do I know but most of my collegiate studies have focused on cultural effects of technology so I think I have a background here in understanding how different societal groupds deal with similar situations. Cheers!
  2. My dad is in his 50's and sometimes has trouble arching enough. the dzo showed him a way to practice at home to increase his flexibility. lay on the floor on your belly and put your feet on the edge of the couch and then practice your arch. hold 10 sec rest 10 sec repeat 10 times a night. Or take yoga I'm sure that would help too. Cheers, Jonathan
  3. I'd have to go with a Franziskaner. There is nothing better than some good wheat beer on a summer evening.
  4. I'll use PD for example and their discrepancies. PD 176 actual square footage is roughly 189 which is a better idea to use for wingloading calculations. I'm a new guy, 75 jumps and will probably have 125 or more by the time I find a rig and am jumping it. looking at rigs and am trying to decide if I should go 176 or 193 reserve I'm about 190-200 out the door depending on the day of the week. I have jumped wingloads between 1.1 and 1.2 and feel fine with them. Mainly looking for instructors and or riggers advice. I have asked a number of instructors and riggers and have heard go for the 176 to no stay with a 193, granted I was 15 to 20 pounds heavier when they said that. And what I suspect will be most people's answers "193 is optimal but if you find a great rig for a great price you aren't doing anything stupid by going with a 176"? I've gotten that answer too. Just hoping for some more educated opinions. Thanks in advance.
  5. Um just a thought this summer I walked into a conversation half way in so I apologize for not knowing all the details and I don't remember which company it was but... the canopy company being discussed only designed them and then out sourced the design to 3 seperate manufacturers, for some reson depending which company manufactured the canopy and the date they could require different line sets. also in this story the canopy company was not very helpful in resolvign the situation. same scenario? not that that helps but it may explain it.
  6. I haven't shot skydiving yet but I am a semi pro photographer. I shoot alot of extreme sports and wildlife. I have tried other rebel digitals and I just don't think the auto focus is fast enough. I shoot an eos 1 film and a 20d and even the 20d is sometimes slower to focus than I would like. especially if you aren't shooting a usm lens. anyhow wondering what peoples thoughts are on the xti that have used it.