ErricoMalatesta

Members
  • Content

    515
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by ErricoMalatesta

  1. Yeah as if by magic they are a terrorist group now! No. Also false.
  2. This is complete garbage. Meritocracy doesn't work in terms of social mobility.
  3. I like it when self-evident fuckwits don't understand basic political theories and go out of their way to make themselves look stupid - wd. Oh that is obvious... you do it so well... you at least give us a good laugh... Just remember we are laughing AT you...not with you. Thats ok because nobody can hear you over the laughter of bringing Marxism into it.
  4. This is also nonsense. Mutual aid, communal living, non-hierarchical, gift economies, etc societies were all prevalent in the past. Are you claiming all of those are forms of anarchy? I don't think any of them are mutually exclusive of having a heirarchy (except for the category named non-heirarchical - and name me a society that is or was non-heirarchical). Pure anarchy disappeared long ago; if the definition is everybody for themselves and no rules to follow. 1. Yes. 2. That isn't anarchy.
  5. I like it when self-evident fuckwits don't understand basic political theories and go out of their way to make themselves look stupid - wd.
  6. Oh really??? LA riots come to mind for you??? How about Katrina???? Your reasoning and examples are so poor it is hilarious and you clearly don't understand much social and economical theory to even postulate them. Your argument could be used - and was used - for feudalism and slavery.
  7. Implicit in non-authoritarian socialist theory is the discussion of hierarchy and power. So the implication that Anarchism theorises anything like this is pure idiocy. Third world countries are not a model for Anarchism which just shows how shallow your understanding of the world is. If anything they are unregulated markets - what is called libertarian in the US. This is also nonsense. Mutual aid, communal living, non-hierarchical, gift economies, etc societies were all prevalent in the past.
  8. And I think its fairly self-evident you don't know what the fuck you are talking about. Libertarians ARE Anarchists. Only in the US does Libertarian mean the exact opposite of its traditional meaning. So if we put the stupidity of US-Libertarianism aside which is idiotic bullshit that calls for an actual free market and is the strong VS the weak. Then you are left with actual Anarchism which has nothing to do with the strong VS the weak. US-Libertarian ideas? Yes I agree those ideas can be seen in the weaker African countries.
  9. American patriots killing mud people and breaking international law! Pathetic.
  10. I voted yes for the selfish reason that more people can hear how delusional and disgusting their ideas are and take my lead in bashing them.
  11. Like the two decade long non-violence of many Palestinians while they were subject to extreme forms of racism and overt aggression from the Israeli state and settlers? Whoops my mistake I keep forgetting dropzone is US centric which means 90% of the posts are devoid of actual historical understanding and 95% of the posts regarding the Israel/Palestine conflict are complete nonsensical bullshit.
  12. much much much much more morally superior. not even close to being anywhere near being on the same level. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/delusional
  13. executing families? that's wild even for you... let me use one of the analogies you like so much. a crime is a crime, right? shooting someone is a crime. shooting someone who shot you first is less of a crime. yet again (as always) you take Israel's reaction as the initiative. so let me remind you (again) that Israel was not in Gaza and Hamas kepy launching thousands of rockets at civilian cities to which Israel had to respond. Well you clearly don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Israel broke the ceasefire as admitted to by the Israeli government itself. So it was the initiative.
  14. You're a bright guy, and you normally have sensible posts on just about everything else; but when it comes to this conflict, your moral compass chronically only points in one direction. All war is abhorrent. Over and over again, you only point out atrocites of one side, and then rationalize the atrocities of the other. Except for one key thing - they aren't atrocities by any comparative standard. They are war crimes - firing an unguided rocket into a civilian population most certainly is - but for them to be atrocities they would actually have to... you know... hit people on more than a rare occasion.
  15. I bet people in Egypt and Saudi Arabia would like some of this sovereignty and independence.
  16. There isn't a single anarchist theorist who has ever argued that Anarchy is a strong conquering the weak model for society. If anything this theory applies directly to today's world.
  17. I find this shocking. Nothing good is going to come out of this. Obama is proving to be a truly dangerous person. Obeying international law and dismantling weapons which could end the species - Yeah what a shocking and not good thing.
  18. An American who doesn't want to follow international law - how surprising.