ErricoMalatesta

Yeah it is a doctrine as mentioned I am glad to know that all non-religious people are in fact defeatist pessimists with nothing but despair about the world around them.

The Catholic church has its problems. One thing you need to understand about Chrisianity. You don't get in by presenting an "I am sinless" card. In our faith there was only one card carrier. If a pedophile finds his way into the priesthood, it's abominable, but it needs to be dealt with, just the same as if, say, a college professor or elementary school teacher uses their position to get sex. I understand your disdain for Christians, but why the constant attacks? I'd never lump you into the same group as Debra Lafave. College professors who bang grown women are "abominable" and on par with pedophiles because the grown women are also their students... you are putting moral compass repair men out of business owning such a finely tuned instrument.

Yeah because the USSR was communism... ...and it still exists...

Yeah the problem is he killed white people...

By 1962 you had killed about 100,000 with Diem and then Juntas so what is a 'shooting war'? Committed troops aka invaded country (further).

Which the company did. Democracy in action! The sunglasses means this bit is a joke... right?

Show me something to indicate that her views have changed. If that were the only thing then maybe I could buy it, but with the "I am finally proud to be an American" and going to Rev. Wright's church for 20 years, it only reinforces my concern. Also, if you read her thesis, there are other radical statements that lack the “was” word. Look out America you might have a first lady that gives a shallow and appeasing attempt to make the impoverished minorities a little better! What do you think she will do? Transgress her structural role in the society or break free and use her power position to spark a black panther revolution? Or maybe its just that what spare change there is will go to black ghettos *gasp* instead of just being swallowed up along with the rest of the wealth by the people who control the country... like herself and all the people she interacts with.

Military service? That is to a government not a country and a fairly pathetic measuring stick for being able to criticize structures around you, but whatever I am sure you have a US flag pillow case to rest your head on at night.

Except these were NOT anti-war protesters; THAT is simply the spin the FoxNews headline writer attached to them. In the body of the article it says; Anybody that calls themselves "anarchists" are not anti-war, they're anti-government. I would guess most of them are very much anti-war, anarchist is just an umbrella term. Except these were NOT anti-war protesters; THAT is simply the spin the FoxNews headline writer attached to them. In the body of the article it says; Anybody that calls themselves "anarchists" are not anti-war, they're anti-government. They want Anarchy? We can give them Anarchy. Start by informing them that in an Anarchy, there is no such fucking thing as "due process" or "the right to an attorney." Let them rot in a fucking gulag. Let's not forget this part: "A group of protesters came toward the delegation and tried to rip the credentials off their necks and sprayed them with a toxic substance that burned their eyes and stained their clothes, delegate Rob Simmons told KMSP-TV. One 80-year-old member of the delegation had to be treated for injuries, and several other delegates had to rinse their eyes and clothing, the station reported." What the FUCK, man?! I'm telling you, GIVE the "Anarchists" their anarchy. Make a fuckin' reality show out of it. The world would get to watch just how much "Anarchists" love what they've been seeking once they get it. From past experiences of you not knowing much about anything I doubt 'anarchy' is somehow in your knowledge bank either Actually it is all, ironically, pretty relevant and there are tonne of parallels right now to that of the late 19th and early 20th century. If you mean the violence is irrelevant than sure it probably isn't doing much.

Uh.. want to read some history and get some facts and get back to us. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reza_Shah_Pahlavi Please blame the country who REALLY brought him to power... OOPS sorry I doubt YOU can do that since you hate the USA so much. Please.. go on with your regular schedled whining. I don't hate the USA which just further highlights your over all stupidity/ignorance. Here is "reading some history and getting some facts" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d'%C3%A9tat

How about the Iranian backed and supplied explosives that killed over 200 American Marines ... or is that a freedom fighter to you?? In Beirut? Remind me again if there are 200, or more, Lebanese soldiers in Washington. The Shah that you installed after overthrowing the country decades ago... talk about holding a grudge let it go Iranians. Yeah killing foreign soldiers who are in your country is terrorism and all you ever hear is crying about America and Israel... you have the Middle East all figured out. Actually you are in for a rude awakening because a lot of you reflect positions such as this...

The thought that anyone could actually believe this is fucking stupefying . Do some of you not get your own political system? It is a multi billion dollar position. A poor "half-brother" living in a shack isn't suddenly uncovered.

So you have on one side the neighbors who run to you when there is a power blackout because you have a gun and on the other side you have a guy who scared off dogs with a gun. Wow, you make convincing arguments about gun ownership.

I typed this in another thread several hours ago... "I think I get dumber every time I read things you type. " ...and this thread greets me on my next visit

Is there any reason why the Fringe LEFT should want to remain ignorant of their boy's association with violent radicals?? I think I get dumber every time I read things you type.

Yeah because states exist to protect you from crazy Muslims and the nice police man and FBI agent are just trying to help the world - how unethical to leak what is usually shit that the public are concerned about that people higher up social hierarchies don't want them to know. I heard the chocolate ration just went up to three grams a week! Awesome!

What I was implying was that someone so hypocritical as to proclaim his countries murder as 'free democratic dictator stopping' doesn't have a leg to stand on in an argument about anyone else's affairs. Domestic violence is often less 'serious' than international conflict. It's wrong for Russia to invade Georgia, very wrong... However they are not rolling tanks through the country to overthrow the government and capture the capital. It is a domestic/provincial dispute which, as far as I have read, involved Georgia bombing the civilian population before Russia ever stepped foot across the border. How would a similar event have been framed in the west? US invades Mexico or US defends Mexico. It is attempted annexation, and again wrong, but to compare Russian action in its current context to US action then Russia would have to have suddenly sprouted 40,000 men inside Nigeria and Congo. It is 'serious'... it is 'serious' for all the innocent people catching Russian and Georgian shells in their apartment blocks... its not 'serious' if the word is used in a comparrison and defence of US action.

Russia was never a communist country. I would like to see you get a basic education about your own country in regards to words like "free democracy" No. It's not very serious at all, thats the point. Here is something that is much more serious; traveling across to the other side of the world to invade two countries, murder several hundred thousands people and create millions of refugees... oops I mean EXPORT FREE DEMOCRACY AROUND THE WORLD AND END EVIL DICTATORSHIPS.

HAHA.

Don't forget America the problem is "corruption" and questionable campaign "contribution" not that you don't actually have elections.

Even with massive "illegal" influx you want to prosecute them hardest over having pursued regular labour work (aka non-violent contribution). Yeah that is very sensible

Quickly watch this some more! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Dawn Can Patrick Swayze save the day?

one deserved it, the other, fuck it, it deserved it too. The moral being - pick a fight, and sometimes an even bigger bully responds. I guess by your logic 9/11 was well deserved too.

What he said. I have no reason to believe there's such a thing as a "soul." Blues, Dave If we dont have a soul, then why arent we all the same? Even identical twins, with the exact same genetic makeup, have differences. There is an extra ingredient thrown in there somewhere, right? So... animals, other than humans, are all the same? Or do they have souls as well?

Who cares when the soul enters the body we still haven't figured out what Merlin's most powerful spell is! Which element? I bet it is something water based as opposed to fire based.