MDMA
-
Content
93 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by MDMA
-
Howard stops Oz Cricket team going to Zimbabwe
MDMA replied to shropshire's topic in Speakers Corner
I'm expecting the yanks to invade zimbabwe at any moment..... -
No, you misread shropshire. You don't have to if you believe you're big and powerful. "Right and Wrong" is for sheep. I get you now !!!
-
so, the United Nations is a joke? something to be complied with only if you want to and if you don't want to, you don't have to because you believe you're right?
-
no chance of finding her alive after this time If the worst comes to the worst, and i fear it will, then i hope the parents at least have a body to take home. It's going to be heartbreaking enough without having to return home knowing you're leaving your child behind
-
News:Dangers of policing the streets Research carried out by the Police Federation for England and Wales last year found 40,000 officers had been faced with a knife, and 7,000 threatened with a gun, during the previous two years... A survey by Jane's Police Review in March 2006 found 21,845 assaults on officers in 51 forces across the UK in a year. Most forces showed year-on-year increases... Source: BBC Do you think America has a gun problem?
-
I'll ask again
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8mfGx_wuvQ&mode=related&search=
-
I feel the same way about X users. you've never tried it then
-
I don't think smokers should get medical health treatment if it's a problem caused by smoking, tough i know, but stuff them !!!
-
ok, i'll shut up
-
they need more troops because too many are being killed how many American troops have now been killed? and how many do people think will have to lose their lives before "dubya" pulls out in defeat and then claims victory? oh, one last question..... how many civilians have lost their lives since the start of this wonderful illegal war? One deffinate last question..... If another country (lets say America shall we) starts a war against another country, a war which is illegal by the rules it agreed to abide by with the United Nations, why isn't the leader of that country (lets say America again shall we) put on trial for war crimes against all the innocent civilians it then kills due to the illegal war?
-
Why isn't there freedom of speach on here? Why is it that a person can have a view point, and just because it isn't the majorities view point, they get called a troll and can get banned? can anybody explain to me why People say freedom of speach is so important, yet they them think it's ok to call somebody a troll and ban them?
-
I take drugs myself, so i think "what the hell, if these people want to claim benifits and spend it on drugs, have fun!!!!!" good luck to them if they want to get off their heads, have a good pill on me
-
depends how much he strains when he farts
-
apparently to handle N. American tourists No, we have Burger King keeping all you fat tourists in check
-
so? what's that got to do with this policeman being shot dead ?
-
Since by armed you mean in posession of a gun, the policeman would not have been armed. no, sorry.... i mean if the policeman had been armed and the killer was unarmed
-
the pro-gun crowd would like you to believe that every innocent person killed by a gun would have been killed anyway, they just happened to have been killed by gun by their killer, and that their killer would have used another methos anyway if he hadn't had a gun they simply will not admit people die due to guns, those people were going to die and just happened to have met their death by gun..... they will not admit that somebody would not have killed if they didn't have a gun, they will not admit gun deaths are carried out by people taking the opportunity to kill by the fact they have a gun, and wouldn;t kill if they didn't have the gun
-
And what's to say he wouldn't have used a butcher* butter knife or a cricket bat - you can't say he wouldn't have killed if only he didn't have a gun. * - sorry, forgot y'all aren't allowed those anymore, either... that seems to be the standard defence from the pro-gun crowd... "but they might still have killed anyway, even if they hadn't had a gun" how many people on here think he would have killed the armed policeman even if he didn't have a gun? keep in mind he would be unarmed, facing an armed policeman
-
in this case, the gunman was a legal gun owner, he had been drinking and went home to have a domestic argument with his partner. he had a gun at home. the argument caused the neighbours to call the police, the usual unarmed police turned up and he didn't kill them, he only decided to use his gun when faced with an armed policeman. he shot the policeman dead and then killed himself from this i'd say a few things.... 1. he hadn't intended to kill anybody initially 2. when faced with an armed policeman, he decided to kill by using his gun 3. he wouldn't, and didn't, kill untill a gun came in to the senario (the armed policeman) 4. he wouldn't have killed anybody unless he had had the gun 5. the policeman would still be alive today if the guy hadn't been legally able to own a gun
-
taking the weapon out of this particular gunmans hands would have stopped the policeman getting shot, would you agree on that? Yes. . that will do just fine, thanks very much
-
Sex offender registration...always appropriate?
MDMA replied to livendive's topic in Speakers Corner
fixed it for you -
taking the weapon out of this particular gunmans hands would have stopped the policeman getting shot, would you agree on that?
-
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/shropshire/6632017.stm and people say gun controls are not needed this policeman would still be alive if that gun hadn't been around
-
I'm all for eating meat I'm talking about people who go out simple to shoot animals because they think it's fun....yes, some of them might eat it afterwards, but that's irelivant really, they killed it for the fun part killing for fun is for numptys