flybounce

okay, i'll stop pestering this thead and it will go back to a boring-ass illogical thread. most logic and cogency went away with brenda and jack allready anyway. have fun with the atrophy. message to tough guys, i'm leving and will not defend myself. feel free to trash me in cowardly safety. quade, if i hurt your pride again, ban me.

Sorry, but that's just not a logical conclusion to make; they never found Amelia Earhart either. Yeah but she supposedly went down in the ocean. ................................................................... I've often hiked into some of the most remote places that you can find here in Montana. Just when I think I'm the only one whose ever been somewhere I'll find something to remind me, that isn't true. It might be spotting another hiker or hunter. It might be boot tracks etc. There's just a lot of people out hiking around almost everywhere. That's one reason I don't believe in Big Foot. Where could he hide out, where nobody would find signs of him. I just don't think there are many places in Washington or Oregon that would just swallow up someone....unless it is water. That's why I think D.B. Cooper went into the river. After all these years, I think someone would have found his chute and body if he died on land. There's a lot of thick brush and trees in that area, but I have my doubts if they would hide a body and parachute for that many years. Didn't they find some of the money in the river? .....Steve1 you all are failing to evaluate something about the dead cooper theory. money found upriver of the related drainages.

you meant let's keep it civil anyone who disagrees with me or sky. i learned my lesson. i will refrain from destroying any of your faulty logic in the future. there's obviously repercussions.

as for the other two that left? most likely got tired of trying to use logic on brick walls, especially abusive, ganging up hypocritical brick walls. or maybe they just do not suffer fools well.

or maybe i was banned, tough guy, and couldn't defend myself. you probably prefer it that way. forget about the ban? yor theory about sexual inadequecies ignores the most plain evidence that would explain the absences. but this ignoring the most likely evidence goes along with most posters to this thread.

You won't be remembered that way here. Certainly there are differences of opinion, but discussing those are what the forums are for. Things were fine until some assholes with an agenda popped in and started harassing you, but it seems that they have either been banned or have drifted off looking for some other way to compensate for their sexual and intellectual inadequacies. We look forward to hearing about bothe the new information and your trip to the Northwest.

i'm, for the record, repeating every bit that fit with the majority agenda and so was ignored as a personal attack.

so i was banned and he wasn't? no one seems to want to defend the right of somene saying something against poor miss skyjack. what about brenda? are you all that hypocritical and paper thin?

if you listen to her stories long enough, you'll change your mind keep your bettin money safe for somethin else

hey, didn't you recently offer a truce, you lying, old drunken windbag? i didn't say yes quick enough? you delusional old hag? he made a veiled reference that he hoped would be interpreted thataway and still give plausible deniability. thanks for defending the coward. wow, he agrees a lot with you so you defend? astonishing intellectual honesty. how's that for gibberish. you're whole made up plan and story is gibberish.

?????????

oh my, so your last part says fbi agents can read. are you claiming to be one? if so, your know it all attitude from less than stellar sources and leaps in logic would explain why the case never got solved. i don't beleive you are an agent, though. the books by those who actually used some semblance of method for research are the best so far but are not perfect. try himmelsbach or tosaw. you will find that the best guess is that he never took his glasses off and that tina never stood next to him while he was standing. did she ask him to set the bomb down, stand up for a compare and to please take his glasses off for a picture? the guy wasn't stupid. tina - 5 hours solid with him is a bit of a stretch, even from unreliable sources. the landing, the first reply to you is experinced, well thought out and reasoned. i'll give you something less, i would duplicate the jump if someone set it up and offered me 1/10th the value of cooper's stash. $100,000. any takers? i think it was two bourbon and 7-up's. not a drinker? you can't know that. people have different motivations for different things. don't turn good or bad guesses and opinions into facts. isolate the descriptions - no composite descriptions - to the ones that should most likely know, he was compact, wellbuilt, swarthy, receding hairline,and had dark, peircing eyes. (he probably wore sunglasses as disguise the whole time, but no-one's perfect.) make-up? what fool said you can't take it down your neck to your chest. i think he probably had a solid weather worn tan, and no makup, but i could wear some disguise or stage makeup and spend the day with you and you wouldn't have a clue. not all makeup is an old thick pancake base. most all wigs are probably obvious, not painfully obvious. so many peopls turn opinions into facts. want to know a good investigator, ask him what the facts are, look for a short list, with no room for opinion and a longer list of probablies. cooper had a.d.d.? i got it now, you're a high level fbi profiler. you''re hot on the trail of cooper and you're sharing the knowledge with the public. is a.d.d. a diagnosis doctor? or are you projecting? where is the weather report from? is that local, or the whole pacific northwest. specifics, bob. i'm slamming you when other's have slammed me. is it wrong? i couldn't resist because of the veiled fbi agent claim and the trying to turn bad info into fact. did ya see jo? i supported the drinker claim for you and duane. hey, bad methodology is what it is.

ted's not hard to find. phonebook. sheridan, or. jo also knows how to contact. or, just look at what he has already said on camera. compare the contradictions from all sources from teddy's own testimony. also, what he says that the fbi contradicts. jo? troll here and non-genuine person. i have never shopped a book deal like you have. i've never been nto those other sites, but nice try. your story is pure crap surrounded by fluff. by the way, great planning to take a pic of duane in the db cooper sunglasses from the sketch. i see that on your little thumbnails on the left of your posts. how lucky to have planned that snapshot in advance. now i am being facetious. if you call me troll can i call you hag? can i call you a fake person? would this name calling end if i let you know my identity? would you walk down the street and have coffe with me? or would you do your best to make my life and a couple of our neighbors as miserable as you could? no way, someone who would do that would resort to name calling as much as she thought she could get away with when someone disagreed with her. jo, your plan and surrounding story has always been crap with no evidenciary backing, strings of massive illogic, and contradiction of you, by you. have fun, and good luck on your book deal. i really wouldn't mind if you made a few million. there have been less beleivable books written on the subject, but only slightly.