flybounce

okay, i'll stop pestering this thead and it will go back to a boring-ass illogical thread. most logic and cogency went away with brenda and jack allready anyway. have fun with the atrophy. message to tough guys, i'm leving and will not defend myself. feel free to trash me in cowardly safety. quade, if i hurt your pride again, ban me.

Sorry, but that's just not a logical conclusion to make; they never found Amelia Earhart either. Yeah but she supposedly went down in the ocean. ................................................................... I've often hiked into some of the most remote places that you can find here in Montana. Just when I think I'm the only one whose ever been somewhere I'll find something to remind me, that isn't true. It might be spotting another hiker or hunter. It might be boot tracks etc. There's just a lot of people out hiking around almost everywhere. That's one reason I don't believe in Big Foot. Where could he hide out, where nobody would find signs of him. I just don't think there are many places in Washington or Oregon that would just swallow up someone....unless it is water. That's why I think D.B. Cooper went into the river. After all these years, I think someone would have found his chute and body if he died on land. There's a lot of thick brush and trees in that area, but I have my doubts if they would hide a body and parachute for that many years. Didn't they find some of the money in the river? .....Steve1 you all are failing to evaluate something about the dead cooper theory. money found upriver of the related drainages.

you meant let's keep it civil anyone who disagrees with me or sky. i learned my lesson. i will refrain from destroying any of your faulty logic in the future. there's obviously repercussions.

as for the other two that left? most likely got tired of trying to use logic on brick walls, especially abusive, ganging up hypocritical brick walls. or maybe they just do not suffer fools well.

or maybe i was banned, tough guy, and couldn't defend myself. you probably prefer it that way. forget about the ban? yor theory about sexual inadequecies ignores the most plain evidence that would explain the absences. but this ignoring the most likely evidence goes along with most posters to this thread.

You won't be remembered that way here. Certainly there are differences of opinion, but discussing those are what the forums are for. Things were fine until some assholes with an agenda popped in and started harassing you, but it seems that they have either been banned or have drifted off looking for some other way to compensate for their sexual and intellectual inadequacies. We look forward to hearing about bothe the new information and your trip to the Northwest.

i'm, for the record, repeating every bit that fit with the majority agenda and so was ignored as a personal attack.

so i was banned and he wasn't? no one seems to want to defend the right of somene saying something against poor miss skyjack. what about brenda? are you all that hypocritical and paper thin?

if you listen to her stories long enough, you'll change your mind keep your bettin money safe for somethin else

hey, didn't you recently offer a truce, you lying, old drunken windbag? i didn't say yes quick enough? you delusional old hag? he made a veiled reference that he hoped would be interpreted thataway and still give plausible deniability. thanks for defending the coward. wow, he agrees a lot with you so you defend? astonishing intellectual honesty. how's that for gibberish. you're whole made up plan and story is gibberish.

?????????

oh my, so your last part says fbi agents can read. are you claiming to be one? if so, your know it all attitude from less than stellar sources and leaps in logic would explain why the case never got solved. i don't beleive you are an agent, though. the books by those who actually used some semblance of method for research are the best so far but are not perfect. try himmelsbach or tosaw. you will find that the best guess is that he never took his glasses off and that tina never stood next to him while he was standing. did she ask him to set the bomb down, stand up for a compare and to please take his glasses off for a picture? the guy wasn't stupid. tina - 5 hours solid with him is a bit of a stretch, even from unreliable sources. the landing, the first reply to you is experinced, well thought out and reasoned. i'll give you something less, i would duplicate the jump if someone set it up and offered me 1/10th the value of cooper's stash. $100,000. any takers? i think it was two bourbon and 7-up's. not a drinker? you can't know that. people have different motivations for different things. don't turn good or bad guesses and opinions into facts. isolate the descriptions - no composite descriptions - to the ones that should most likely know, he was compact, wellbuilt, swarthy, receding hairline,and had dark, peircing eyes. (he probably wore sunglasses as disguise the whole time, but no-one's perfect.) make-up? what fool said you can't take it down your neck to your chest. i think he probably had a solid weather worn tan, and no makup, but i could wear some disguise or stage makeup and spend the day with you and you wouldn't have a clue. not all makeup is an old thick pancake base. most all wigs are probably obvious, not painfully obvious. so many peopls turn opinions into facts. want to know a good investigator, ask him what the facts are, look for a short list, with no room for opinion and a longer list of probablies. cooper had a.d.d.? i got it now, you're a high level fbi profiler. you''re hot on the trail of cooper and you're sharing the knowledge with the public. is a.d.d. a diagnosis doctor? or are you projecting? where is the weather report from? is that local, or the whole pacific northwest. specifics, bob. i'm slamming you when other's have slammed me. is it wrong? i couldn't resist because of the veiled fbi agent claim and the trying to turn bad info into fact. did ya see jo? i supported the drinker claim for you and duane. hey, bad methodology is what it is.

ted's not hard to find. phonebook. sheridan, or. jo also knows how to contact. or, just look at what he has already said on camera. compare the contradictions from all sources from teddy's own testimony. also, what he says that the fbi contradicts. jo? troll here and non-genuine person. i have never shopped a book deal like you have. i've never been nto those other sites, but nice try. your story is pure crap surrounded by fluff. by the way, great planning to take a pic of duane in the db cooper sunglasses from the sketch. i see that on your little thumbnails on the left of your posts. how lucky to have planned that snapshot in advance. now i am being facetious. if you call me troll can i call you hag? can i call you a fake person? would this name calling end if i let you know my identity? would you walk down the street and have coffe with me? or would you do your best to make my life and a couple of our neighbors as miserable as you could? no way, someone who would do that would resort to name calling as much as she thought she could get away with when someone disagreed with her. jo, your plan and surrounding story has always been crap with no evidenciary backing, strings of massive illogic, and contradiction of you, by you. have fun, and good luck on your book deal. i really wouldn't mind if you made a few million. there have been less beleivable books written on the subject, but only slightly.

jo, er, scotty11, you used the word fecitious. no one around here will let you use it in scrabble. did you mean facetious? anyway, welcome new person to get you up to speed, i think i know a lot and probably do. jack is the only one that i would say definitely does and backs his stuff up. anyway, were supposed to argue in circles and forget facts. have fun. oh, fyi, the ones who disagree with skyterrorist that lost money in bucket , er , skyjack are free to be openly ridiculed and deserve no sympathy. bash away.

i'll go one step further. scotty 11 is in my opinion weber, or someone she hired with cookies or sympathy. jo, i'm not that easy to draw out. not to you. i don't want to get someone else in trouble for just this. thanks for the compliment by the way. if i could, i would gladly take credit for being one of the two guys that solved the case. whats so bad about accusing a callous criminal of something he probabaly did. you're trying your damndest to accuse your poor hubby of being the cash terrorist of flight 305. one that could find his way down and then not find the bucket. so a dumb terrorist? at least he had the genious to make the money land together, bury together, and degrade at an amazing rate. poor man, well, okay, he deserves your accusations. this plan for money for you was mostly his. good luck getting to WA. the neighborhood can breathe a sigh for a week anyway. nice thing though, your insults let me know you still care. good luck on your millions. call me an idiot in your book. can't wait for the exciting next episode in the next 12 monthe. i'll stay tuned. i'm sure it'll be exciting fluff, er, stuff as for the jump being impossible to ballpark? mr. mayfield disagrees with you. wholeheartedly. he has a lot of experience, too. blanket statements to support your theory are still an opinion. there were a room full of rocket scientists a few years ago that said a piece of foam couldn't bring down a shuttle. those were very well educated, very knowledgeable opinions. some from designers of parts of the craft. they were still, i believe without malice, wrong. as for the jump itself? $200,000 would be worth what, $1mill. today? heck, give me the same conditions today and set it up, i'll plan it and walk away with $100,000 in today's money. any takers? go together on it? jo? you could get rid of me. heck, you all say you won't have to pay up anyway?

wow! i've been away too long. sooo much. i can think of some worse places, but evidence points to north battleground or farther north. the only explanation of the money where found of is a guy who made it (unless a steelhead swam it upstream and deposited one pack of three bundles. drainage basins being what they are.) could mayfeild plan and execute something like this? no? not smart enough (financial genius with nothing but hobby jobs since being a 7 up driver{36 years ago}, worth less than $0 until moving to sheridan and putting up a building for cash and getting a twin engine beech?)? experience (over 6000 jumps - 1 he'll never admit to.)? reckless (only 2 convictions for others lives, 11 with no convictions)? wouldn't threaten people for just money (only one conviction)? no stealing (only 1 conviction)? you're right teddy's just a pipe dream. funny thing him lying to those investigators about it and him lookin a lot like the schaffner sketch. just coincidences. as for the mean guys attacking the lack of skydiving experience, find some attacks with some legs, weber schill, them dogs don't hunt. btw, talked to a smoke jumper out of winthrop who at the time was the most experienced s.j. at the time. good man. said he wouldn't do it, but no prob. come to think of it, teddy contradicted what he said to fbi, he said no prob. does he have enough experience to comment on the jump? on this jump, i think he knows more than any of us. and jo? i didn't say a bar. you? two drinks and one bar ever? yeah right! i gotta go talk to the ether er, Easter bunny now. by.

jack is a manipulator for his own purposes? oh my!!!!!! would jack have a million dollar story if he were right? no, you would if you were! but you're not right, you know it, i know it, duane knew it and so do others. you expect us to beleive you didn't know about cooper? just a small paper? i guess people didn't have tv and radio news back then in Ga? duane would drop big clues about being the cash terrorist of flight 305 (that oops lost the money in a bucket) to let you in on it and then draw back when it could've gotten a little closer? every time there is a good challenge yo your "facts", you come up with more "facts" never before seen. as for everything you said, CITE YOUR SOURCE, or it's just disjointed, illogical, unbeleivable crap like everything else you said on this whole site. at least jack makes sense and cites his sources very well. wow, you have tina's adress and have talked to her? first of all, with your credibility, i'll beleive it when i see a video of it. if it did happen, you must indeed be a super sleuth. i'm sure you found it on your own without someone contacting you with it. by the way, jack didn't p.m. me to defend him. i'm just allergic to b.s. that publicly distorts history and combatting your crap about your and duane's plan is the prescription from my doctor.

great stuff, jacko. can i call you that? i'll check the stuff out. i appreciate that you know your stuff and can back it up. irrefutable facts, for some reason seem to carry more weight with me. thanks again.

oh yeah, fogot. the fbi watches this sight. because descriptions are perfect, they're letting the unabomber out of jail along with about 20 bank robbers just this week. they'll want more info about duane, too. you've all convinced 'em. ted's free and clear forever.

oh my! first. more "facts" what other site am i posting on? how do you know? this other proof that you have now, source it - oh wait, you don't do that. what interview? where. i don't have a sight, so crash away. have you crashed competing sites before? or do you have someone else do it for you. i know your highest hopes are to beleive that your husband is the flight 305 terrorist for cash that he burried in a bucket and lost, but you should refrain from the threats of that which is illegal. you're beginning to shake my unwavering faith in you. while you're getting nasty, you should remember some of the things you have said at local gatherings under your breath to good friends when you've tipped a bit to much spirits. never knew who dan cooper was before duane died. hah! you and duane both knew didn't you. whatever plans you two made will just be between you and me and the 6 or so people that we know that know. you've had your fun. pee in my cornflakes and i can use the internet, too. as too the brave supporter of this kind little old lady who happens to have other sympathy provoking maladies when needed, you said i was incomprehensible? when adressing you, i'll use monosyllabic word and no metaphor or similie. i'll also try to eat up more of my time separating my thoughts better so you can understand because i like you so much. i got nuthin' better to do with my time.

by the way, it's interesting that all of a sudden, 5 people can pop up at once defending your lowly asserted, highly motivated story. that's it. "here where i stand today, i am alittle old lady." i'm sick. i'm widowed. i just want the truth and closure. didn't help? o.k. fine. maybe i need to p.m. a bunch of people and get their quick support. sounds like a p.r. campaign. i don't feel the need to do such things. actually, i'm not even asserting my own facts. so if you want me to prove everything in triplicate, up yours. demand the same from both sides. i am only asserting my evaluation of a solid case against mayfield against popcorn and fluff from other suspects. popcorn and fluff is very unsatisfying. so is reading the emotional support and attacks for a crappy case. check out the youtube "the real db cooper". evaluate the contradictions and illogic from mayfield and himmelsbach. then talk intelligently about this. or...just call me a troll again. i promise to change my mind, sulk and go away forever. (that last part was sarcasm)

wouldn't it be a better story if he wrapped a twenty around the bottle? what was the money for? 4 years ago that i know of, you were trying to find an author that would write the duane as cooper book. aw shucks.

hi. anonymous troll here. for the record, i have been skydiving and it was enough of a kick to do it again and again. obviously i was never committed to the sport enough to stay with it. sorry. i have read much of other parts of this site. this is the only one i have enough knowledge or interest in to comment on. sorry. yes jo webber has been here longer. sorry. the fact is, however, that she flings insults too. if i put a picture of myself up as a little old widow lady, do i get more leeway and credibility with no verification? i just want the truth. sorry. in my opinion, there is lots of evidence that mayfield is cooper. sorry. if my little old neighbor lady has a crappy voice and wants to go on american idol and i tell here to keep going, it might give me warm fuzzies, but i am not doing her any favors. sorry. way back when, i said j.w. and me know some of the same people and run in some of the same circles. i figured out that it was ambiguous and could be mistaken for jack wilson. i meant jo weber. sorry. nothing personal, jo. if you get joy and hope from this keep going. just show something compelling. before you attack me, i have read the whole thread. a good troll does that. sorry. if you are looking for some sort of fullfillment from your husband having been known as the terrorist of flight 305, you will be dissapointed. i'm not trying to be cruel. i just go where the verifiable evidence leads. sorry. good luck jo. but, everyone should be a bit nicer. sorry. remember, attacking an idea or something offered as fact in a public forum in pursuit of the truth does not damage the dignity of the human person giving it. your ideas are the result of the soul, not the soul itself. sorry.