marks2065

Seeing as how you have spent years talking about Republican spending and now are fawning over Obama's GREATLY increased spending, we're supposed to accept your hypocritical accusations, why? Who said I approve of the current massive spending (begun, I might add, under the previous administration). Had to add some important information I understand that because the GOP's denial that there was a recession had left us in a huge hole that some stimulus was necessary, but I think it's gone way too far. Remind us how much the Bush/Paulson bailout of AIG cost us. I read just this week that the next round of bonuses to AIG execs is coming up.

It's ok - he's a Dem, and Dems can do no wrong Well, they've certainly been outspent by the GOP up to this point. Quoteat least with RR & GB (1&2) alot of the money was spent on defense and we did bankrupt USSR and got the wall to come down in germany, opened up alot of countries to more freedom than they ever had. what positives have come out of Carter, Clinton, & Obama? Illegals get a free pass and health care and the government now runs most of the major financial and auto businesses. when do we get to see the positives for the hard working americans?

Let's not forget that the OP quoted a one-sided OPINION piece from a right wing columnist in a right wing newspaper, and the other link was from FOX. Don't go treating it like objective news from the BBC.

I disagree. As far as I know, the vast majority of Germans, Italians, and Japanese do not currently want to kill us. See also: The British They all have one thing in common, they all got their asses kicked by us. Our vanquished foes become our best allies it seems.

so the entire wind grid is equal to 10-15 coal plants.yes it cuts down on emissions but still not big enough to do the job. As far as the jobs created here, it says 70 factories were open, expanded or anounced, how many of these 70 are anounced? anouncing and actually doing are 2 different things.

source for that info? My understanding was that the decision to withdraw after liberating Kuwait came from the top, ie, specifically Bush/Powell/Schwarzkopf. Can you cite a source? edited to add a 1992 quote from noted Pussy Liberal, Dick Cheney: "I would guess if we had gone in there, I would still have forces in Baghdad today. We'd be running the country. We would not have been able to get everybody out and bring everybody home. And the final point that I think needs to be made is this question of casualties. I don't think you could have done all of that without significant additional U.S. casualties, and while everybody was tremendously impressed with the low cost of the (1991) conflict, for the 146 Americans who were killed in action and for their families, it wasn't a cheap war. And the question in my mind is, how many additional American casualties is Saddam (Hussein) worth? And the answer is, not that damned many. So, I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him from Kuwait, but also when the President made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq."

+1

Pussy Liberals like Bush Sr., Colin Powell, and Schwarzkopf??

Quotedon't worry cap and trade is almost here, then we can talk about that huge, made my bank acount swell to an unbelievable size, $13 a week we got from Obama.

there is only ONE farm in the country that has actually paid for itself. billvon posted to that one. As for the rest? None have covered costs and made profit. They are only being built to placate the enviros and politicians and can only be afforded because of gov subsides

He knows exactly what he's doing.

Both parties have failed big time in accountability, but this is like going back in time to the Clinton, "the dog ate my homework" years. 9 trillion has not sunk in for the major news networks to pick up on this?