davjohns

Man with a plan. I like! I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Underwear I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

If you're going to go all literal... Food is over rated. The average person under average conditions could probably live 30 or so days without any at all. Care to...test that theory? I don't have to. It's well documented. http://sams.scientificamerican.com/article/how-long-can-a-person-sur/ In survival, it's called the rule of three. You can go three minutes without air. Three hours without shelter (inclement conditions). Three days without water. Three weeks without food. Three months without human contact (you can survive past that, but you get weird). I know I could live without them, but I currently have four knives and three flashlights on my person. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I've never really understood the legal idea that someone can drive at 16, but isn't legally responsible for their behavior until the age of majority (18 or 19). Then, they are legally responsible for their behavior, but can't buy a pistol or drink alcohol for another few years. But they can make medical decisions at 14. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Starting with strength of character and moving forward? You knew him? Dennis Rodman has a strong personality too. Does that mean he's gay? Tough call. Remember, he married himself at one point. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

:p Sorry about that. It's a hot button for me. A really good minister is a teacher in my book. I'm not particularly religious. In part, because so much about religion makes no sense. One of the great things about traditional Judaism is that it makes sense. It's not necessarily random dictates, it's wisdom. I try to break things down to simple, blinding flashes of the obvious. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Hmph. Curling. I LOVE curling. I love you, Jerry, but... You...are...so...weird. Why don't you head to my home state and watch the ice melt. Or can your heart take the excitement? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

You guys are killing me with that toe sucking stuff. Blah. Edited for spelling. Killing you?? That's all I thought about during my last pedicure!! Nasty disgusting!!! I guess your mom never told you that you have to at least try something before you reject it. According to the philosopher Seuss: You do not like it. so you say. Try it! Try it! And you may. Try it and you may, i say. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I'm from the South. I always counted rhubarb as some kind of penance we did to make us feel better about not having the horrible cold, ice, and snow they have up North. I'm pretty sure people will stop eating rhubarb this year after the current snow problems. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

My best friend just wrote me an email from home (Birmingham, Alabama). He is stuck at work. His wife, ex-wife, kids, everyone...stuck at work. Cars abandoned on the freeways. Hotels stuffed with stranded travelers. Snow and ice like they have never seen before. Weatherman predicted a light dusting that would quickly melt. They blame global warming. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Something similar. I don't care for beer. I don't care for anything with a yeast flavor. I had two roommates in college that kept trying to find a beer that I liked. I have tasted so many now. I still don't like beer. Now, I just accept a drink that is offered and nurse it. It's easier. But still...feel free to change my mind about brownies and the rest. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Ummm.... I can see the reasoning, but I don't think my mind jumps to 'sex with underaged girls' outside the exact context. Sex with a well groomed woman is sex with a well groomed woman. I can't see my mind wandering to sex with an underaged girl unless that slant was already there. Did they avoid oral and anal sex because it reminded them of homosexual sex? If so, how bad is their sex life that their minds wander so much? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Maybe they just haven't had the right one. Back in the day there was a place in Montgomery that served a warm cream cheese brownie with a scoop of vanilla ice cream. IIRC they also had the best apple pie I've ever had. Hm. Now I want to do some baking . I think I could get pretty close to their result without a huge amount of effort, but that's not really a super power I'd want to have. It would definitely screw up my wing loading. Nooo!! Believe me I've eaten enough brownies! It's seems when people find out someone dislikes brownies they just HAVE to make some from grandma's recipe that they are positive is the best one in the world!! People I dislike brownies and there's not a recipe in the world that will make me like them. Oh shit! Great plan! Thanks for sharing, P5. PEOPLE! I HATE BROWNIES! Now, send me samples of your recipe and I'll let you know what I think. (I'll supply the milk) David W. Johnson CMR 450, Box 112 APO AE 09705 Oh, yeah. I also hate sex, PMs with pictures of shapely women, money...you get the picture. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Someone said they don't understand the attraction of brownies??? Did anyone check their medication? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I get they look great AND are damn comfortable. I am reminded of a scene from 'The Game' where Michael Douglas is dangling from a ladder and loses a shoe. He remarks, "There goes $1,000". The girl with him asks, "Your shoes cost $1,000?" He responded, "That one did." To the OP - I understand the connection he was trying to make. Making a connection to something so emotionally charged and with so many points of similarity lacking was ill-advised at best. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Or sent it in an email, or posted it on dizzy.com, or tweeted it (Mr. Spitzer) ... I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Came home from college courses. My mom was on the phone. I hit the door and my mom pointed at the television in the livingroom. I just sat down in my dad's chair and stared at the TV. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Was it any good? I really like Tom Hanks' stuff. He's a real actor. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Thanks. Don't get me wrong. I think people can learn from their mistakes. I think second chances are good. I also recognize that you only get so many looks inside someone's soul to see who they really are. Once you do, they tend to close up that hole. People usually learn from their mistakes because the mistake costs them so much. They learn because they realize what they are doing and turn away from that behavior by their own choice. They learn because they truly regret their choices. When someone gets caught....well, everyone is sorry they got caught. But that's not the same thing, is it? What they learn then, is to cover their tracks better. Let's face it, if they didn't lose anything, why should they change? If you forgive and forget, you deprive the offender of the natural logical consequences of their actions and the related learning experience. If an SO comes to you and confesses their sin against you of their own will; makes themselves transparent to you; works hard to make amends; etc. They have a good chance of learning. If you CATCH your SO....what would you do if you caught someone burglarizing your house? Give them a second chance? OK. So you love your spouse. Do they love you enough to never cheat on you? History would indicate otherwise. And you know what they say about those who refuse to learn from history. This is from someone who has been there. Once you remove the emotion, logic and facts lead you to an all to easy to spot conclusion. And the kids? Both of my adult kids have told me that the only thing I did wrong in their childhood is stay with their mother. Sorry if I go on too long. I hate to see others make the same mistakes I made. Life is too short. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Due to excess courtesy and cooperation, you are both banned from SC indefinitely. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

WORLD ECONOMY EXPLAINED WITH TWO COWS............ SOCIALISM You have 2 cows. You give one to your neighbour. COMMUNISM You have 2 cows The State takes both and gives you some milk. FASCISM You have 2 cows. The State takes both and sells you some milk. BUREAUCRATISM You have 2 cows. The State takes both, shoots one, milks the other and then throws the milk away. TRADITIONAL CAPITALISM You have two cows. You sell one and buy a bull. Your herd multiplies, and the economy grows. You sell them and retire on the income. VENTURE CAPITALISM You have two cows. You sell three of them to your publicly listed company, using letters of credit opened by your brother-in-law at the bank, then execute a debt/equity swap with an associated general offer so that you get all four cows back, with a tax exemption for five cows. The milk rights of the six cows are transferred via an intermediary to a Cayman Island Company secretly owned by the majority shareholder who sells the rights to all seven cows back to your listed company. The annual report says the company owns eight cows, with an option on one more. AN AMERICAN CORPORATION You have two cows. You sell one, and force the other to produce the milk of four cows. Later, you hire a consultant to analyse why the cow has died. A FRENCH CORPORATION You have two cows. You go on strike, organize a riot, and block the roads, because you want three cows. AN ITALIAN CORPORATION You have two cows, but you don't know where they are. You decide to have lunch. A SWISS CORPORATION You have 5,000 cows. None of them belong to you. You charge the owners for storing them. A CHINESE CORPORATION You have two cows. You have 300 people milking them. You claim that you have full employment and high bovine productivity. You arrest the newsman who reported the real situation. AN INDIAN CORPORATION You have two cows. You worship them. A BRITISH CORPORATION You have two cows. Both are mad. AN IRAQI CORPORATION Everyone thinks you have lots of cows. You tell them that you have none. Nobody believes you, so they bomb the crap out of you and invade your country. You still have no cows but at least you are now a Democracy. AN AUSTRALIAN CORPORATION You have two cows. Business seems pretty good. You close the office and go for a few beers to celebrate. A NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION You have two cows. The one on the left looks very attractive. A GREEK CORPORATION You have two cows borrowed from French and German banks. You eat both of them. The banks call to collect their milk, but you cannot deliver so you call the IMF. The IMF loans you two cows. You eat both of them. The banks and the IMF call to collect their cows/milk. You are out getting a haircut. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Eric Buel found a new source of funds and went out on his own. The new EBR1190 is pushing 185hp and 102ft/lb while weighing less than 400lbs. Not as good as a Ducati someone on here pointed out to me; but very sweet. I don't know how to answer this thread. I can't think of anything that people do where I can't understand that they might be attracted to it. Just because I don't choose to participate doesn't mean I don't understand. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Funny. I was thinking something similar this morning as CNN was showing excerpts. I can't believe all Democrats loved what he said so much that they had to stand up so often in unison. I can't believe all Republicans hated everything he said so much that they sat there with dour faces. It's just a mirror image of when GWB was giving the address. I enjoyed it much more when I started trying to decide what they would wear if they did it in Kabuki Theater fashion. And then I could see Michele getting up there and twerking again. Let's face it, it could have been much more entertaining. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I thought you got the thread title wrong until I read further. I figured he was choking the chicken and that made him plow into the chicken joint. The reverse order is much more amusing. So glad i never got into drinking. No telling what Mexican jails I would have frequented or whose clothes I would wake up in. I'm plenty odd without chemical assistance. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Just curious...did anyone else see the title of this thread and immediately think of The Knights Who Go Nee? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.