NovaTTT

Right on! "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

Current I&R Pricing $60 If you watch: $65 If you help: $100 "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

Not going to speak for Paul, but I'm thinking that it's because the Vigil has a firing thresh-hold that some, myself included, find intolerable. In general terms and avoiding & in no reference whatsoever to the Argus Situation, an AAD that doesn't know or isn't sure about what's happening should do nothing whereas in that same situation the Vigil chooses to fire. CYPRES seems to have the features and parameters most AAD users are comfortable with. Just my thoughts on this narrow point in this broader converstation. N "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

Sorry for your troubles, Bry. Best wishes for you and your family. "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

The table is in poor condition - the formica laminate is badly split in a few places, the head mounts are shot, the motor needs an overhaul. The H stand is OK; old but sound. The unit has a knee lifter and treadle which both work fine but they're old and I prefer the feel of the newer ones, probably because I've only worked with relatively new and newer machines. I may replace them, I may not. I have a C550 servo on the way as well as a light and a spool stand. That should at least get the unit up and running. I've found Westchester is a good source for table and stand supplies, although I bought the servo from a different seller ($30 less). You might find a table and stand for your Sailrite! "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

It's definately a solid, heavy machine, Ski. Unfortunately the table it came in is shit, as is the motor. As just one example, you can see from the photos the four corner supports for the head are in poor shape. Frankly, except for taking the photos I'm not leaving in the table because I don't trust the two pulley end supports won't fail. They wobble and shake like a freshman co-ed at a Friday night frat party. One nice thing about the table, however, is that it is 60" which gives tons of room for working. But I haven't decided if I'm going to get a new table and stand for this machine. If I do then I'll refinish this table and fit it for my wife's Kenmore she's uses for quilting. For now I'm going to drop it into the table my 3115 sits in and see how it performs and learn how to adjust the components for different uses. I anticipate tearing up some materials before I get it zeroed in! "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

Hi, MEL. I had no idea it is an unusual machine when I talked about it with the seamstress from whom I purchased. I haven't as yet found any literature on it; no manual, no discussions, no anything. I'll keep looking but I suppose I'll have to compare it with the 146 manual. Sure will be nice if parts are compatible. After getting it up and running I'll work on learning what I can about the machine and the history of it. 'Til then, anyone's thoughts, recollections or experience with a Consew 99 in this configuration sure would be appreciated - and interesting! "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

Here are some more photos of the WF on this machine. 99-04 shows the linkage that operates the WF 99-05 shows the attachment of the WF to the presser foot 99-06 shows the end-on view of the assembly 99-07 shows a the WF and the presser foot (raised) 99-08 shows the WF separated from the presser foot (raised) 99-09 shows the WF separated from the presser foot (down) "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

I am offering no opinion as to the merits of this case and/or incident. As I understand it, this is not about cause. It is about contribution. I think the attorney is wanting to assign values of contribution and/or causation in order to exchange that finding for a monetary judgment. IMO except for the "thrill factor" this case isn't about skydiving. It could be about anything. The purpose of the suit isn't to understand skydiving, skydiving practices, regulations or policies, other than how they pertain to individual and/or corporate culpability. The purpose is to assign percentages of blame (some of which will be assigned to the deceased) and determine if and how much those percentages are monetarily valued. .02 "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

Some photos of the walking foot Consew 99R ZZ (Japanese) I picked up for $250. It seems to need only a cleaning and oiling. I have a servo motor, a light and a spool stand on the way. After I refinish or replace the table top it'll be in business.

Was that the sound of a commission being raised I just heard?? "Silly"??? You're a more patient and understanding man than I am, Paul. But for the love of the sport, eh? "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

My personal preference is for an exposed or semi-exposed reserve pilot chute top. Racer tops my list; it's super comfortable and has a long track record. I also like the Javelin, Vortex II and Wings (in order of preference). I also like redheads. "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

I don't know what every error, change, omission or mistake there is or might be, but the PIA response seems to cover your question pretty well. "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

Thanks for passing this on. Ryan is a good kid - young man. Shitty thing to happen, hope he heals fast. Any idea about where to send snail mail? "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

I see there is more beach but I can't see what's behind the camera. What I do see is there is a recreational area and presumably a structure or structures off to the right. Knowing what lakes and coves are like I can easily imagine there is forest behind the beach just like across the cove. That's what leads me to think it was a tight LZ and the TI screwed up the approach and landing. "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

Yep. There's no brother like Big Brother. "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

Thanks for posting this, Terry. So the FAA quietly published the new AC with some substantial changes and omissions from the last draft. Any thoughts that wasn't intentional? Given the amount of prior input and collaboration, is it reasonable to think they will make the proposed (current and previous!) changes? Thoughts on what happened? N "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

I know nothing about business as usual for the GK or about this jump in particular. But I think he was not trying to pond swoop the pax - it seems to me he mis-judged a tight approach to a lake or pond beach. Second 5 I think shows the target lake and seconds 12-14 show the LZ closely surrounded by tall trees. Poor planning and execution are the fail here, IMO. "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

I got a look at the machine today. It is a Consew 99 (Japanese) with reverse and a walking foot. The head is in very good shape. The table is just fair and will need replacing as there is a crack/split behind the belt through-hole and the bobbin winder is not attached. The motor is servicable but questionable (it blew out the outlet when the machine was turned on!) so I will replace it with a servo. $250! ETA: I'll post some photos this weekend after I find a spot for it in the loft. "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

I've only seen the gay pride flag where the colours are stacked top to bottom so I looked for one that is sideways mounted. The red seems to always be on the left so I don't see where your client has a complaint. "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

Did you give the TJNK dbag dimensions to Mike? I am very happy with my UPT ss dbag (J3 Javelin). "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

It's not the same as DZ.com but it is British UKSkydiver "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

@ Remster Yes - the situation the OP discussed, total with PC in pouch @ Labrys OP can pull his cutaway after the reserve is deployed. It's only marginally different than pulling it prior to going silver, other than that time/altitude thing. But he should first talk with his instructor as mentioned, who will advise him on the pros and cons, the equipment concerns (RSL), &c. FWIW my personal preference is to leave the cutaway alone even with two out unless it gets ugly. Haven't had to put that to the test, however. "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

First of all, I am not an instructor. This is just my opinion based on my time and experience in the sport. That said, you need a permanent, workable deployment procedure and definate EPs. The first step in a permanent, workable deployment procedure is a good packjob, which includes a well and properly packed PC. First, use the Rule of Threes. If you can't find or pull your main handle, check or try two more times (three attempts). If that doesn't work, go directly to your reserve. Taking time to deal with a non-existant problem (cutaway from what?) is using valuable time and complicating an otherwise very simple decision tree. No main = total malfunction = pull your reserve. Your priority is to get a good parachute overhead. You've probably heard that pull-time is pull-time and your first priority is to pull. Period. If you get two out then deal with that. If it makes you happy to pull the cutaway handle do so after your reserve is fully deployed. Talk this over with your instructor. Blues. Nova "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73

Thanks all for the further and useful replies. I've not seen the machine yet but the seller, a 20+ year seamstress with a full alteration shop (meaning many machines), described this C99 as having a "true" walking foot. Maybe she's referring to just the lower feed dogs and isn't certain of terminology; I won't know until I see the machine. But does anyone know what she means by "true" walking foot? Thanks again - this is very helpful! Cheers! ETA: I meant to mention above that I would think "true" walking foot means an actual upper feed dogs - something worth mentioning. Maybe it's an add-on? Is this possible? "Even in a world where perfection is unattainable, there's still a difference between excellence and mediocrity." Gary73