Robert99

377, On page 32 of Tosaw's book, Tina is quoted as follows: "Cooper put the military parachute on his back and cinched up the canvas straps to make them fit his chest and thighs. Tina noticed how quickly and easily he completed this complicated operation - just looking as though it were an everday occurrence." 377, as a good defense lawyer, I am sure that you could come up with 50+ different interpretations of that paragraph depending on your goals. And maybe in the cross-examination you could find out how the "canvas straps" held up during the jump. R99

http://overheadbin.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/11/23/8982109-40-years-later-new-evidence-emerges-in-db-cooper-case still fucked up - probably shut down for the holiday with a ton of advertising cookies to load on people's computers ... wait 5 mins for the thing to load if its going to - what is "pure" titanium? Like "pure" jello or pure gold ? What is Tom Kaye trying to say? This link works okay for me. If all else fails, go the the original story on and scroll down to the story which is on the left side of the "Travel" section.

May I carry this to Portland and read it for you? Bruce, It is already on Gray's web page.

I do! How old were you in 1972? About age 11 give or take? So, you've been following the FBI and McCoy since 1972? Since age 11 ? Tell the truth. Somewhat older. How much exactly is impolite to ask, but if you had read Blast, you would know I was a soph at Sumner High at the time of the hijacking. And it's not how long you've been following the case that is most important. It's what you've learned along the way. So as a Sophomore in HS you began studying the FBI and DB Cooper case, like Mileva Maric studied calculus and helped her husband re-write his notes? Blevins, you should have become a Swiss Patent officer/clerk! Georger, Now that Al's brain is on public display, perhaps someone could download his memory cells and determine if Mileva deserves any credit. But she did get the money.

Here is what a speed skydive looks like http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yemCdQSKkt8 Rigging Innovations built a custom rig for the world champion speed skydiver, Marco Wiedekehr. Freefall speeds are in excess of 300 mph, and therefore you can't just use any ole' rig (which is why Marco came to us). And another http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZizL93ODY6w Video of STRIP's SpeedSkydiving jump # 189. Performed in the Casale Monferrato's skies the 27th of July 2008. Maximum speed reached by the speeder ~420 Km/h. The speeder is STRIP. The videoman is Luca Poretti Amazon, How do you measure the speed on these jumps? Do you carry carry barometric recording instruments from which you calculate the speed? Or do you just plug into the ISS's telemetry and let NASA do the calculating? We wear two of these... http://www.l-and-b.dk/products/audible/protrack and the speed is averaged between the two. They ahve to be within 30KPH/18 MPH of each other or the jump is considered Out of Bounds( getting the devices into a burble or dead air can affect them greatly when someone gets unstable on a dive.. IN competition, we wear special RED Protracks that are provided by L and B with a closer set of tolerances... During the competition, the paired Pro-Tracks are switched between the different competitors to ensure that there are no two devices that might give any one competitor an advantage. Amazon, Thanks again.

Here is what a speed skydive looks like http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yemCdQSKkt8 Rigging Innovations built a custom rig for the world champion speed skydiver, Marco Wiedekehr. Freefall speeds are in excess of 300 mph, and therefore you can't just use any ole' rig (which is why Marco came to us). And another http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZizL93ODY6w Video of STRIP's SpeedSkydiving jump # 189. Performed in the Casale Monferrato's skies the 27th of July 2008. Maximum speed reached by the speeder ~420 Km/h. The speeder is STRIP. The videoman is Luca Poretti Amazon, How do you measure the speed on these jumps? Do you carry carry barometric recording instruments from which you calculate the speed? Or do you just plug into the ISS's telemetry and let NASA do the calculating?

Think head down and all tucked in. I got to 185 according to my black box. Others have reportedly hit 300. 377 377, The speed is a function of the drag area presented by the jumper and his equipment and the total weight of jumper plus equipment. There is a finite minimum to the drag area that a jumper can present. However, if he is to accelerate, his weight must exceed the total drag (or else he has reached his terminal velocity or is slowing down). So in the lower atmosphere, the desired body type for such a jumper would be one that is tall, skinny, has maybe a 100 pounds of lead strapped to his head, and a helmet that has a cone top for streamling purposes. In the upper atmosphere, say 30 or 40 thousand feet, I think that maybe 300 MPH would be possible. Of course, at 100,000+ feet, supersonic free fall is possible as demonstrated by Joe Kittinger. Your 185 MPH agrees with everything that I have seen in the parachuting literature for head first free falls.

377, While I have never heard of this before, it might just be possible for an experienced jumper to do it. As a minimum, he would probably need to have a good visual reference to the horizon (to help maintain the proper body position) and a LOT of speed. And a "winged" jump suit would be very helpful. Presumably, the jumper you described jumped from the stairway of a DC-9 type aircraft. If anyone tried this with a 727, they would have to go through the exhaust of the center engine and just a relatively short distance behind the engine. In other words, they probably wouldn't be around to try it a second time.

Farflung, On the retractable landing gear for most low speed general aviation aircraft, think "Ego". That is, the one who dies with the most toys wins. The landing gear in sailplanes generally consist of a single main wheel with a small (maybe two inches in diameter) tail wheel. If the main wheel is retractable, it is usually by a mechanical system using a simple hand lever. The wheel well does have doors and they are spring closed. In the case of high performance sailplanes (maybe a 50 to 1 lift-to-drag ratio), even lowering the drag by a pound or two, as retracting the landing gear would do, increases the performance by maybe 10 percent or more.

Georger, neither 377 or anyone else jumping from the rear stairs of a 727 in stable level flight is going to hit the engine exhaust. The high pressure and velocities from the engine exhaust are equalized fairly rapidly over a period of several seconds. But the downwash and the wing tip vortices may require several minutes to completely dissipate. The downwash and vortices are the price for producing lift. And a jumper in a free fall is going to be below those things very fast. But even a 170 knot blast of wind is going to shake up people jumping into it but it is different from the things mentioned above. Can I point out.. that the jumper is also travelling at 170 Knots.... The human body though is just not as aerodynamic as the fuselage of the aircraft is. ( I have been over 300 MPH in freefall a few times... I know just a bit about this) Amazon, You may indeed point out that a jumper in an airlplane that is doing 170 knots is also doing 170 knots (assuming he is not moving around inside the airplane). The 170 knots means that the airplane and jumper are doing 170 knots relative to the free air stream. When the jumper separates from the aircraft, he will be in the free air stream in a few seconds and no longer going quite 170 knots with respect to the free air stream and will continue to decelerate until he has reached the "terminal velocity" for his body position, altitude, etc.. Or he may actually accelerate a bit if his terminal velocity happens to be above 170 knots for the specific conditions that he finds himself in. On your claim to having been over 300 MPH in a free fall, would you describe the conditions of those jumps (how high were you and how was your speed determined)? Were you above 300 MPH when you jumped? Please provide this information. In all honesty, I don't think that a human body can accelerate to 300 MPH in a free fall in the lower atmosphere, say below 10 or 15 thousand feet.

Farflung, I was discussing "turbulence" produced by the landing gear and not "aerodynamic drag". Retractable landing gears are very nice to have even on sailplanes. On general aviation aircraft, fixed or retractable landing gears are mainly a function of economics only.

Georger, neither 377 or anyone else jumping from the rear stairs of a 727 in stable level flight is going to hit the engine exhaust. The high pressure and velocities from the engine exhaust are equalized fairly rapidly over a period of several seconds. But the downwash and the wing tip vortices may require several minutes to completely dissipate. The downwash and vortices are the price for producing lift. And a jumper in a free fall is going to be below those things very fast. But even a 170 knot blast of wind is going to shake up people jumping into it but it is different from the things mentioned above.

OK. Im sorry. Lets just let Blevins, Airtwardo, and Class Clown and JT and you set the agenda here. And not post anything else? So Robert99, what will Blevins and his mother be eating on Thanksgiving Day? Give us the inside story! Did you know Blevins wont be attending the Ariel Party or the Symposium - did you get that? Blevins. Post it again. Some may have missed it. Jet engines on airplanes dont matter nohow - yepper! YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAW! Dead air zone - dead air zone! 8 days and counting. Okay smarty pants, I'll tell you what the term "dead air" means in this instance. But first, where did you get that beautiful picture of a two-engine "727" in your attachment? Do you think a three-engine "727" would have a more pronounced downwash and trailing wing tip vortices, other things being equal? In 377's previous posts about jumping from a DC-9 stairway, he stated that for a few feet after leaving the fuselage exit the air was relatively calm. Then things got extremely turbulent as he hit the free stream air flow. A few seconds after that, 377 would be clear of the downwash and turbulence behind the aircraft and the rest of the freefall would be "normal" (at least after he slowed down to his personal terminal velocity). The term "dead air" refers to that first few feet of air flow that 377 described. Hominoid and I have also pointed out that the same phenomena of "dead air" can be observed on any car or truck on the free way during rainy weather. That is the behavior of the air that you can see around the rear bumper area. On the matter of jet engines on airplanes, they do matter if you are interested in getting from Point A to Point B in a reasonable time. If you are not interested in doing that, they don't matter (you just have a sailplane). I'll leave the other questions to anyone who knows what the answers might be.

Can't help about the flow field of engines running or their impact on overall flow field. I suspect that the impact is modest because: the center engine intake is distant and its exhaust is distant and downstream; the side engine exhausts are about 9' to the side and 9' up from the end of the stairs. Some side-to-side impact from side engines could be cancelled by symmetry. Hominid, Think of the engine inlets as being sinks for the adjacent airflow and the engine exits as being sources for some of the downstream airflow. Between those inlets and exits, the entering air is highly energized by a magic process known as a turbine engine. Thus the exiting air has much greater energy (velocity, heat, etc.) than the ambient air and this induces the air outside the engine flow field to flow inwards toward the aircraft centerline. Therefore, the engine exhaust flow field has a major impact on the flow field, including downwash, behind the aircraft. The landing gear's turbulence would be a minor factor compared to the engines. We have discussed the "dead air" zone behind the fuselage previously.

QuoteAnd the clothing....how many times have you seen people jumping with damn near nothing on...Quote A number of years ago, there was a small picture in Newsweek (I think) of a young lady in Sweden (again I think) who was in a stable free fall wearing nothing (so it appeared) except the parachute.

I DO believe the money may have been a plant, a red herring done sometime after the crime to try and throw off the FBI. Blevins, The money was found more than 8 years after the crime. What do you mean by "to try and throw off the FBI"? They didn't have a clue at that point.

There is more evidence leading to the idea that he lived, rather than died. The two biggest examples are the money found at Tena Bar (far off the flight path and if you believe Tom Kaye's team, unlikely to have just washed up there on its own) and the other is the lack of a body, parachutes, remainder of money, briefcase, etc. They DID find the placard, though. A reletively small item. Blevins, You have obviously given up on KC and joined Jo Weber's team to support the idea that Duane planted the money at Tina Bar. You should keep in mind that interpretations of various pieces of evidence are subject to change as new information is developed. Nothing is engraved in stone yet.

They were issued these cloth helmets for practice jumps..I believe in 1941 and the 503rd were the only ones to wear them so far as my research has shown me. http://www.ww2-airborne.us/18corps/503_overview.html My Dad told me about jumping into the golf course. He's also in those combat jumps shown in the below link. http://www.ozatwar.com/usarmy/503rdparachuteinfantryregiment.htm eta: he always had fond memories of the Aussie girls...or Sheilas as they are known locally... hangdiver Those are excellent links. In one of them, it looks like the lead C-47 was not more than 500 feet off the ground with paratroopers coming out. In another scene it looked like one of the jumpers had opened his reserve. But I have heard of instances where the paratroopers left their reserves on the airplane because they were jumping from such low altitudes that they would not have had time to deploy them if they were needed.

It's fairly extensive. Boeing ran tests, which pretty much everyone who worked on the 727 had to have heard about. Back in the those days, Boeing was THE major employer in Puget Sound, not like today with Microsoft, Starbucks, and all the rest. And everything they did was closely watched, discussed, ruminated upon, made newsworthy on the local nightly news, etc. As far as the one single item, i.e. airstairs in flight, it was known by a lot of people at Boeing, especially the bread and butter guys, that this test had been done before the plane was released. I keep promising myself to ask my father if he heard anything personally, since he worked there from 64-70, then became a victim of the Big Layoffs. Where is the evidence that "a lot of people at Boeing" knew that this testing had been done prior to the hijacking? On 11-25-1971 everyone in the country knew that the 727 could be jumped.

Well...as fate would have it...I just discovered one more piece of evidence Sunday at a family meeting (code for fighting over shit my siblings want)...that my dad was Cooper. I opted for an antique 8mm movie camera and some antique bicycles rather than the worthless antique armoire, hutch and other stuff that doesn't interest me...but I did get the coin collection and my dad's military memorabilia that included his Sterling Silver 503rd Jump Wings. Pic attached... Now I have his 503rd cloth jump helmet, the very first Airborne patch and his Jump Wings to make a skydive with in the Spring...come on Meniscus...heal...heal...!!! eta: by the way...if you see someone gimping around Ariel it's not me... hangdiver Cloth jump helmet? When did he use that and what for?

I have the tax reports from 1969 and they show virtually no income for a couple of yrs and yet 2 new cars where purchased and a Trailer on a lot and he loaned his BOSS - $5,000 on a note....How does a man who only made a few hundred dollars loan his BOSS the next yr - 5K? I have the IOU. I have mentioned these things over the yrs. but I don't go into detail. How in 1979 after Duane and I returned from WA did he purchase not one car but 2 others. One of the vehicles I had NO knowledge of until a smart Cookie caught it in the tax report? So you see the paper money trail is there just like with KC only Duane basically bought things and gave people money. He was NOT a good investor and the money was HOT. He could only spend what he WASHED in Tahoe and Vegas (he and the exwife went to Vegas). He and I went to Tahoe. Some how 50K came into existence when Duane went on dialysis. No one can explain this and he used it over a 5 yr period of time until his death. I have also explained about a safe deposit box I could NOT find information on from 1980 to 1990. Only the FBI could access those records and they refused to do so (Carr is the one who flat out said NO). KC's transaction were to Transparent for Cooper. You have no concept of the economy during those times or you would NOT continue to boast about KC's investments and loans to individuals. I did live and work during those yrs - so I know how it was. I was frugal and I put away money, but my then spouse spent every cent he could lay his hands on - always chasing easy money with pyramid schemes and why I divorced him in in early 1972. When I got rid of the baggage I made it with 2 kids and myself working a secretarial and accounting job. Remember that back then - if the guy didn't pay the child support there was no way to get it - so the women worked 2 and 3 jobs. I had savings when I married Duane about 7 yrs later and owned my car (used) - only 2 yrs old when I bought it. Now go chew on them apples. A single woman in those days making it on her own with 2 kids and child support checks that usually bounce. I made sure I had money in the bank to cover his check when they bounced and I always had a savings account. When I say I had only $5 to take myself out for my birthday in 1977 is because I saved 10 cents out of every dollar I made. I paid my bills and put money away before spending it on myself or something frivolous. My children and the bills and saving came first. I do remember a couple of times I had to hit the savings hard because I got laid off, but I that is why one saves money. KC did not have kids and let me tell you if I was able to survive with 2 kids and I made a lot less than KC (women didn't make much in those days) - KC was doing well.. My not making the financials available is my business, but the paper trail is there. Living in WA and making a big show of money you could not support - would be a very bad move during the yrs KC loaned individuals $'s and bought things. KC lived frugally and that is obvious...but no kids to support. Men making what KC did sometimes had wives who did not work and yet these guys put their kids thru college and bought homes and lived well. Track KC's life and income with others of the day and see how they lived...and that they did well. Jo, While I am sympathetic to your plight in the 1970s, things were also tough for single fellows then. Strong drink and fast women were NOT cheap then either. But I also survived.

Jo, To repeat, what Social Security Number did John Collins use when he was employed? The rest of your comments don't matter.

For Heavens Sake, Georger keep your pants on. I do not stay on the computer all day. The name of the company was Interlock Screw and Bolt Corporation out of Atlanta, GA in 1970. I do not believe they still exist. The branch manager at that time was Buck Deal. Good Luck. The SS number of John Collins has been researched, but the FBI refused to provide the work record. Only the SS recipient or a survivor or government agency can access those records. I have all of the employment data for Duane L. Weber (just the amounts made and the yrs of the reported income). The yrs from 1962 to 1967 are BLANK with 0. This list was acquired when he applied for disability. What we do know about the SS number for John Collins is that it was issued in 1964 in MS. That is the sum total of information I have and Doug Pasternac acquired that. I have had others extract the numbers from me claiming they can produce the detailed work record - but guess what? They never produced one iota. A man in CA claimed his connections would allow him to go were others could not - he gave me IOTA. He claimed he could find out Duane's employment records under Weber and Collins. If he found it - he did NOT give it to me! Jo, The Social Security Administration, and NOT the FBI, provides the work record. All you have to do is visit your local SSA office, fill out a very simple form, and they will send you that information.

Orange, I am starting with your post because it was inappropriate and you obviously have no concept of widows benefits. Duane died in 1995 and he drew SS on his name but could NOT claim the 6 yrs he spent as John Collins. When I turned 62 I was eligible to draw widows benefits which I did because my health insurance was so expensive. My health insurance took most of the benefit. When I was 65 I was eligible to draw on my own number which was more and I got medicare, but I had remarried. Having remarried I was eligible to draw on my current spouse of the time.. No you do NOT draw on more than one spouse. I now draw widows benefits off of my last husband - but not off of Duane or my benefits. What is unfair is that several wives can draw against one man. If a man had 4 wives and he was married to them at least 10 yrs - each one of them can draw against his benefits. That is NOT fair! If you divorce a man and he remarries - why should his benefitssupport a wife who left him for another man? Why should I have to spell this out to someone who does not live in the states? I only do so because I do NOT use the system the way other's do. If my last spouse had a wife who divorced him after 10yr and her new spouse dies and the spouse she divorced dies - she can draw the highest amount...even though she did him wrong and they divorced. NOW that is NOT fair. When you divorce someone - you should NOT be entitled to their benefits...unless there are minor children. In other words reap what you sow. Jo, In post number 28181 you claimed that you had copies of W-2s for Duane's employment by a nut and bolt company just prior to November 1971 as well as copies of the tax returns on which those W-2s were reported. You also claimed that Sluggo visited your house and saw those W-2s and tax returns. Georger has asked you for the name of the company that appears on those W-2s. All you have to do is read the information on those forms. Who issued the W-2s? They are the equivalent of todays 1099s (or whatever it is). Also, if you have the SSN that Duane used as John Collins, you can get an earnings report for that number from the Social Security Administration. The above actions are as simple as it can get. So there is no excuse for you to now claim otherwise. Put up or shut up!

The company? What company? Name it. Jo, What Social Security Number did Duane use with the John Collins name?